Deficit commission: Four things both sides may agree on

Thursday headlines note the failure of President Obama's bipartisan deficit commission to reach consensus, but the opposite is also true to some extent. Key Democrats and Republicans on the commission voiced agreement on some important things during the panel's public meeting Wednesday. Sooner or later, these points of common ground could help pave the way for legislation.

1. 'Fundamental tax reform'

Cliff Owen/AP/File
Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., then-ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee. meets with reporters on Capitol Hill on Feb. 2.

A sweeping overhaul of the tax code can boost economic growth and help solve the deficits.

Both Republicans and Democrats lauded the general idea known as "fundamental tax reform," which would simplify the tax code and broaden the base for tax revenues (by eliminating many credits and deductions). This would allow the government to collect more tax revenue without raising official tax rates on households and businesses.

Making the tax code more efficient would help to ensure that an effort to reduce federal deficits doesn't backfire by choking economic growth. Sen. Judd Gregg (R) of New Hampshire said the proposal "takes us out of this box" of debating unpopular tax-rate hikes as a deficit fix. The two sides still spar over details, with Republicans wary of using reforms to grab a lot of new revenue from taxpayers.

1 of 4
You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us