#TedCruzCampaignSlogans: How Ted Cruz went from candidate to cautionary tale

After Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz announced his candidacy on Twitter, the snarky backlash on the social network was unprecedented. What went wrong?

|
Andrew Harnik/AP
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks at Liberty University Monday to discuss his campaign for president. Cruz, who announced his candidacy on Twitter in the early morning hours, is the first major candidate in the 2016 race for president.

A Georgetown University media and politics expert says that Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas just went from presidential hopeful to a fable about the political risks of social media.

On Monday, the senator announced his candidacy for US president on Twitter, a platform used by many politicians to announce their election bids.

But this time, the hostility from Twitter was unprecedented. Diana Owen, associate professor of communication, culture, and technology at Georgetown University, describes it as "not like anything we’ve seen before."

Of the viral, and largely comic, response currently taking place under the hashtag #TedCruzCampaignSlogans, she says, "This is going beyond what we’ve seen happen when a candidate announces on social media."

To Professor Owen, who teaches a graduate seminar on social media in elections, a campaign must have staffers fluent in the language of social media long before officially launching. Her students are currently working on a book on the issue, and she says that Cruz's campaign likely just earned itself a cautionary chapter.

“Social media is being used to polarize elections. The playbook is being made up right now. The media is so dynamic it’s just not prudent to announce on Twitter unless you know how to manage the double-edged sword you’re using,” she says.

She says she suspects that the tag may have been “hijacked by a aggressive DNC social media operative” whom she herself trained, saying, “This is what one of my former students, now high up in the DNC social media’s team, does every day.”

“Of course it’s difficult, if not impossible, to prove that a social media reaction isn’t grassroots because of the nature of the beast and its inherent anonymity,” Owen says.

Owen suggests that a good parallel for understanding the dynamics of what just happened to the not-so-Twitter-savvy campaign is to imagine being a non-French speaker in Paris, phrase book in hand, and blurting a poorly accented “Bonjour!” to a crowd of snarky people.

The resulting flow of French response would leave the phrasebook holder a bit embarrassed and bewildered.

“He [Senator Cruz] made the mistake of perhaps not knowing what he was getting into on Twitter. He’s up against aggressive campaigners in the DNC who really know how to use social media,” says Owen. “While I teach my students how to use social media responsibly, once they transition into the campaign realm they turn all that on its head.”

Asked what countermeasures she would advise those in Cruz’s circumstances to do in order to make a political and social media recovery, Owen says, “If Senator Cruz wants to come back from this, unfortunately, the only thing to do at this point is to not just let it go. What’s out there now is simply too destructive to let stand without response. He will have to engage in a media war of sorts.”

“Senator Cruz also seems to be one of those candidates who really lend themselves to being lampooned,” she adds.

While the effective and aggressive use of social media was successful during President Barack Obama’s campaign against Mitt Romney, Owen points out that no candidate should enter into a social media without someone very savvy on their campaign team.

Owen recalls a student of hers who worked for the Mitt Romney campaign.

"Although, even when the Republicans have a great social media person on staff, they don’t always listen to their suggestions," she says. "My student wanted to get aggressive on Twitter, and the RNC leaders just wanted another radio spot.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to #TedCruzCampaignSlogans: How Ted Cruz went from candidate to cautionary tale
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/0324/TedCruzCampaignSlogans-How-Ted-Cruz-went-from-candidate-to-cautionary-tale
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe