In Hollywood, who will – and won't – back Hillary Clinton?

A number of celebrities have already said they're ready to support the former first lady, US senator, and secretary of State. But there are others who are ready to go in a different direction.

|
Charlie Neibergall/AP
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, left, visits with local residents at The Tremont, Wednesday, April 15, 2015, in Marshalltown, Iowa.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is pitching herself as the champion for "everyday Americans," but she's already getting attention from a group far removed from ordinary Americans – Hollywood celebrities.

Barely had Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy on Sunday than a host of celebrities emerged to show their support for the candidate on social media.

Among them were actors Amy Poehler, Kerry Washington, America Ferrera, Jennifer Lopez, Olivia Wilde, and Lena Dunham; musical artists Carole King, Clay Aiken, and Katy Perry; basketball pro Magic Johnson; model and celebrity chef Padma Lakshmi; and drag queen RuPaul.

Tinseltown's support for Clinton goes beyond social media mentions. Hollywood's top leaders, including Jeffrey Katzenberg and Steven Spielberg, have also pledged their support, likely in the form of millions of dollars of campaign cash.

"I've got an inbox full of people offering to hold events for Hillary," Andy Spahn, a political consultant who advises Mr. Katzenberg and Mr. Spielberg, told the Los Angeles Times. "There is great respect and admiration and excitement around Hillary and also a very clear understanding of what the stakes are."

According to reports, Clinton fundraisers are already in the works in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. And Tinseltown turns out big money in elections. 

The entertainment industry raised about $51 million during the 2008 election cycle, 79 percent of which went to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. For the 2012 cycle, it raised nearly $66 million, some 73 percent of which benefited Democrats.

Not everyone in Hollywood backed Clinton in 2008. This time around, she can expect unprecedented support.

That's because in 2008, Clinton faced competition from the likes of Barack Obama.

"In 2008, there were two green-light actors vying for the lead role," Democratic political consultant Chris Lehane told the LA Times. "In 2016, there is one green-light actor vying for the lead role, which makes it very easy for those in show business to know where they are going on this."

And there's also more interest this time in electing the first woman president – a cause Hollywood is happy to rally around.

Of course, there is the danger that too much Hollywood hobnobbing can backfire for Clinton, especially in a campaign in which she is trying to appeal to working class voters. Clinton's campaign rollout video cast the candidate as a champion for everyday Americans, and a strategic 1,000-mile road trip with a pit stop at Chipotle for lunch helped further the narrative of Hillary as an everywoman candidate.

During his campaign and early presidency, Republicans used Obama's Hollywood support to accuse him of caring more about his celebrity than about the country, and Clinton must be careful to avoid the same criticism, especially because the Clintons have well-established Hollywood connections.

But not everyone is lining up to support Hillary.

Some of the industry's more progressive liberals view Clinton as too moderate and have expressed hope for Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

"I hope Elizabeth Warren comes in and does a primary, because I think that would be good," actor Mark Ruffalo said in a video.

Comedian Mike Birbiglia joked about his loyalties on Twitter.

And some famous Hollywood conservatives, like Jon Voight and Clint Eastwood, are expected to pull for whomever wins the Republican nomination. 

But by and large, Hollywood, which leans famously liberal, wants to ensure a Democrat gets elected.

"Republicans have both houses of Congress, and we are being treated to the prospect of the tea party and right-wing Republicans advocating things that are distinctly unpopular around here," Los Angeles-based Democratic political strategist Donna Bojarsky told the LA Times. "The passion for ensuring the election for a Democrat will be extremely high — it will almost be an obsession."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In Hollywood, who will – and won't – back Hillary Clinton?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/0415/In-Hollywood-who-will-and-won-t-back-Hillary-Clinton
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe