Trump's reality TV playbook: Seven ways it changed 2016 election

5. Money

Most reality shows have a money component, either a prize or a job or both. While TV was born with game shows and amateur performers, the modern iteration of reality programming emerged in the midst of cost-cutting campaigns at the major networks. Producers don’t have to pay screenwriters, and the non-professional performers are often paid pittances. The presidential race is, of course, a job audition. And Trump echoes the genre’s harsh bottom-line focus in his calls to have Mexico pay for his proposed border wall, and pledging to tackle federal waste with big spending cuts.

He describes his campaign as self-funding (his company has loaned his campaign money), and voices pride at how little he’s had to spend so far – instead relying on probably more free news-media air time than all the other GOP candidates combined. One estimate puts the value at over $1 billion.

At the same time, the real estate billionaire seeks leverage over rivals by playing up his own wealth (“I have a lot of money”). He touts that he’s avoiding the fund-raising efforts that make other politicians beholden to special interests. And he has belittled traditional politicians by describing how moneyed interests – including himself in the past – use lobbying and campaign donations to buy political favors.

The continued framing of the narrative through money serves as a not-so-subtle reminder of what he regards as his primary qualification: being a successful businessman.

6 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.