California backlash hands defeat to progressive criminal justice reform

|
Michael Ho Wai Lee/SOPA Images/Reuters/File
Police officers investigate a crime scene after multiple people were shot following a Juneteenth celebration this year, in Oakland, California. Though violent crime is down nationally over time, it has had a short-term uptick in California.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

Californians may have given their decisive support to Vice President Kamala Harris this week, but they took a conservative turn on crime, by defeating progressive criminal justice policies and candidates.

The backlash was in step with national polls showing Americans increasingly concerned about crime, despite an overall drop in violent and property crime since the 1990s. 

Why We Wrote This

California may be a reliably blue state, but it proved not to be monolithic this week. It gave Kamala Harris its full electoral count, but rolled back its support of progressive criminal justice candidates and policies.

California’s crime numbers, though, are relatively high. And, says Mark Baldassare, survey director for the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California, regardless of statistics, what matters most to voters is how they feel about safety at home. 

In response, California voters brought back felony prosecutions for some drug and theft crimes, and in Los Angeles, replaced progressive reformer Democratic District Attorney George Gascón with a former Republican who ran as an independent. And voters in Alameda County supported the recall of DA Pamela Price, a reform advocate.

The variances among Democratic voters are proof that liberal Californians are not monolithic, says Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis. Despite a supermajority of Democrats holding state offices, she adds, “we still have a great deal of plural thinking.”

True-blue California predictably delivered its 54 electoral votes to Vice President Kamala Harris this week. But farther down the ballot, Democratic voters struck a blow at a key progressive policy – and candidates – aimed at criminal justice reform.

The results are in step with national polls that show Americans – both Democrats and Republicans – increasingly concerned about crime, despite an overall drop in violent and property crimes since the 1990s. (Even surges during the COVID-19 pandemic did not see the overall rate reach levels of 25 years ago.)

Crime in particular is a local issue, says Mark Baldassare, survey director for the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California. Regardless of statistics, what matters most to voters is how they feel about safety at home.

Why We Wrote This

California may be a reliably blue state, but it proved not to be monolithic this week. It gave Kamala Harris its full electoral count, but rolled back its support of progressive criminal justice candidates and policies.

“With issues of crime,” he explains, “what’s important is perceptions. And we had been seeing in our polling that people were showing less confidence in their police and more concern about local crime leading up to this proposition.”

Violent crime down nationally, but public perception varies

California’s crime numbers are relatively high. Violent crimes, which have gone up and down over time, remain 15% higher than in 2019. Homicides involving guns are nearly 20% higher than pre-pandemic levels. Property crimes went down in most counties last year, but up in some of the largest, including Los Angeles.

Damian Dovarganes/AP
Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón (center) holds a campaign event last month for his reelection at the Magnificent Brothers Barber & Beauty Salon. Mr. Gascón, who lost Tuesday, had pushed for progressive criminal justice reforms like reduced penalties for low-level crimes in the state’s most populous county.

In response, California voters brought back felony prosecutions for some drug and theft crimes, and in Los Angeles, replaced Democratic District Attorney George Gascón with a former Republican who ran as an independent. Voters in San Francisco held on to a replacement for the progressive district attorney they recalled in 2022. And voters in Alameda County supported the recall of DA Pamela Price, a criminal justice reform advocate; in Oakland, where the count was not finished Thursday morning, the recall of justice reformer Mayor Sheng Thao looked to be winning in early results.

Mr. Gascón served as San Francisco’s DA before taking up the Los Angeles post in 2020 – amid the COVID-19 pandemic – winning with a platform that offered progressive criminal justice reforms like reduced penalties for low-level crimes in the state’s most populous county.

His loss to federal prosecutor Nathan Hochman (who lost two years ago as a Republican candidate for state attorney general) marks a notable shift toward more conservative policies. Mr. Hochman’s campaign promised sentence enhancements for violent criminals, a close working relationship with law enforcement, and accountability for crimes like shoplifting, which more than doubled under Mr. Gascón’s tenure.

With state Proposition 36, voters rolled back some progressive policies they’d voted for 10 years ago after a U.S. Supreme Court order mandated that the state thin out its overcrowded prisons and reduce its outsized share of racial- or ethnic-minority inmates. The prison population dropped nearly 23% between 2014 and 2023, but California continues to house disproportionately large Latino (46%) and Black (28%) populations, as a share of the total.

The new law allows felony charges for thefts under $950 if the offender has at least two previous theft or drug convictions. It replies to a wave of “smash-and-grab” retail crimes that swept through the country during the pandemic.

Damian Dovarganes/AP
In Los Angeles, voters replaced Democratic District Attorney George Gascón with a former Republican – Nathan Hochman (center).

Rebecca McDonald says she’s seen crime go up firsthand at the salon she owns in LA’s Echo Park, where she also finds people openly using illicit drugs. The self-described feminist and independent voter skipped the presidential race on the ballot – she didn’t like either candidate enough to vote for one, she said.

But her top two reasons for coming out to the polls were to vote Mr. Gascón out, and – like 70% of California voters – support harsher criminal penalties.

“I’ve had LAPD officers tell me that there’s nothing they can do if someone steals something out of my shop that’s valued at less than $950,” she says. “That’s not OK. Crime is crime, right? People shooting heroin in front of my shop, I’m not OK with that.”

Tougher stance on criminal justice is proof blue voters aren’t monolithic

But the crime votes don’t necessarily indicate a larger political shift, says Dr. Baldassare. Prop. 36 had widespread, bipartisan support. Other ballot measure results offer a mixed bag: Californians voted to amend the state constitution to protect the right to same-sex marriage; and they funded public schools and policies that protect the environment. But they voted against raising the state minimum wage, and against statewide rent controls. And voters declined to eliminate an exception to the constitutional slavery ban that allows unpaid prison labor.

The variances among Democratic voters are proof that the Californians, although liberal, are not monolithic. Despite a supermajority of Democrats holding state offices, “we still have a great deal of plural thinking,” says Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, a Democratic candidate for governor in 2026.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to California backlash hands defeat to progressive criminal justice reform
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/1108/election-criminal-justice-reform-california-crime
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe