Skip to footer

Battle for women's votes: 6 flash points

The uproar over the Obama campaign’s 'Life of Julia' Web infographic – which made #Julia big on Twitter – highlights just how fiercely both parties are fighting for the women’s vote. The economy is by far the most important issue in November for both sexes. But there are other areas with special significance to women. Here are the main flash points.

4. Domestic abuse

  • By Linda Feldmann Staff writer

The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) is up for reauthorization, and unlike previous renewals, this time it’s political. The Democratic-controlled Senate has approved a new version of VAWA that expands coverage to include gays and lesbians, illegal immigrants, and native Americans. Obama is all for it, as is Vice President Joe Biden, the original author of VAWA during his Senate days.

Through a spokeswoman, Romney says he supports VAWA and “hopes it can be reauthorized without turning it into a political football," according to Politico. But spokeswoman Andrea Saul was not specific about his views on the proposed additions to the law. On April 26, 15 Republicans joined all the Senate Democrats in approving the expanded version, 68 to 31.

The Republican-controlled House is a different matter. GOP congresswomen have introduced a competing version that excludes the new protections.

Republicans accuse the Democrats of including the three groups – gays, illegal immigrants, and native Americans – in a bid to energize the Democratic base and back the Republicans into a corner. It looks as if Romney will not get his wish: VAWA is a political football.

4 of 6
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.