Obama vs. Romney 101: 4 ways they differ on China

China's rise has led President Obama to “pivot” his foreign policy toward Asia, hoping to enhance US power and expand its cooperation with China. Romney speaks more in terms of confronting a country whose interests often clash with those of the US. 

3. Regional flash points

Chris Dickson/Australian Department of Defense/AP/File
US Marine Corps personnel stand at attention with the 5th Battalion Royal Australian Regiment during an official welcome ceremony at Robertson Barracks in Darwin, Australia, on April 4, 2012.

Obama has taken a number of steps to put meat on the bones of his Asia “pivot,” including establishing a permanent Marine base in Australia, making the US part of existing regional forums, developing closer ties to countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, and advancing negotiations toward a Trans-Pacific Partnership trade area.

But Obama has also worked to allay China’s concerns that the US is set on challenging its regional rise: The administration has called for multilateral negotiations to settle territorial disputes in the South China Sea and declined to sell advanced F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan.

In speeches and position papers, Romney suggests that his administration would be a lot less focused on reassuring a rising China about US intentions toward it, and more concerned with buttressing American leadership in Asia and using strong US action to persuade China to play a benign regional role.

Romney, his China and East Asia policy paper states, “will implement a strategy that makes the path of regional hegemony for China far more costly than the alternative path of becoming a responsible partner in the international system.”

Romney says the US should expand its presence in the western Pacific, and he gives strong hints that he would reverse Obama policy and sell Taiwan the F-16s.

3 of 4
You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us