Immigration reform bill: Top 8 changes GOP senators want

More than 300 amendments have been submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee for possible inclusion in a sweeping immigration reform package – at least 100 from just two Republican senators. But Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Jeff Sessions of Alabama are not the only GOP lawmakers to take a shot at leaving their imprint on the immigration reform effort.

Here are eight of their most notable changes to the bill – from a ban on letting any undocumented immigrants become citizens to policy changes such as how many guest workers should be brought into the United States. The Judiciary panel will be taking up these amendments between now and Memorial Day

1. No US citizenship for the undocumented, period

Mary Altaffer/AP
Angy Rivera (l.) and Melissa Garcia Velez participate in an immigrant rights rally in New York in 2012.

This one-page amendment specifies “that no person who has previously been willfully present in the United States while not in lawful status shall be eligible for United States citizenship.”

The bid to put almost a full stop on potential citizenship by illegal immigrants comes from Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas, a conservative firebrand who has staked out a reputation for bluntness after only a few months in the Senate.

Because the architecture of the entire reform bill is predicated on the possibility of citizenship, eventually, for some of the currently undocumented, this amendment stands little chance of clearing Judiciary. Its value: It could show how many Republicans feel compelled to support it and, thus, how many simply won’t back the reform bill.

1 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.