Skip to footer

Who could be the next Ted Cruz? Top 10 tea party primaries of 2014.

Who are the tea party movement's top candidates in 2014, and what are their prospects? Here's a look:

2. Texas: Dan Patrick vs. David Dewhurst; Ken Paxton vs. Dan Branch

Ron Baselice/The Dallas Morning News/AP/File
Texas State Sen. Dan Patrick, flanked by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (l.), speaks to the news media after a lunch with supporters in Dallas last month.

Update: The tea party won big in the May 27 primary runoff. In the GOP nomination race for lieutenant governor, tea party-backed state Sen. Dan Patrick trounced current Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, 65 percent to 35 percent. And in the runoff for the GOP nomination for Texas attorney general, tea party-backed state Sen. Ken Paxton handily beat state Rep. Dan Branch, 64 percent to 36 percent.

Here’s the background:

The two tea party candidates went into the runoff well-positioned to win the Republican nomination. Particularly stunning was Lieutenant Governor Dewhurst’s second-place finish on March 4. In 2012, he was the establishment Republican favorite for Texas’s open Senate seat and lost in the primary to tea partyer Ted Cruz. Dewhurst is likely finished with politics, analysts say.

Dewhurst’s problem wasn’t money.

“The lieutenant governor, who occupies the state's most powerful office, has personal wealth that can provide whatever funds he needs,” wrote Abby Rapoport in The American Prospect after the first round of primary voting. “But Patrick’s fan base is larger – in addition to being a state senator, he’s a talk-radio personality in the state.”

2 of 10
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.