Senate torture report: six top findings

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released an executive summary of its investigation into the Central Intelligence Agency’s detention and interrogation program – an investigation launched in 2009 after lawmakers learned that the CIA had destroyed videotapes of detainee interrogations. Here are six top findings in the report.

3. Some intelligence officials questioned the CIA tactics

This began with FBI agents who had been questioning Abu Zubaydah, who, without the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, had told intelligence officials that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the mastermind of 9/11, the report said.

They expressed concern over the health of Mr. Zubaydah, who had been hospitalized previously. The CIA was planning to use enhanced interrogation techniques on him when he was released, but an FBI official expressed concern. “I have spent an un-calculable amount of hours at [Zubaydah’s] beside assisting with medical help, holding his hand and comforting him through various medical procedures, even assisting him in going [to] the bathroom.... We have built tremendous [rapport] with AZ.”

Zubaydah was subjected to the enhanced interrogation techniques anyway, according to the report, but a senior CIA interrogator objected, saying that the techniques were originally designed by the North Vietnamese to extract “confessions for propaganda purposes” from US troops “who possessed little actionable intelligence.”

The chief of the detention site also warned against the torture. “We are a nation of laws and we do not wish to parse words. A bottom line in considering the new measures proposed is that [Zubaydah] is being held in solitary confinement, against his will, without legal representation, as an enemy of our country,” he wrote. “We do not believe we can assure [that the techniques will be harmless] for a man forced through these processes and who will be made to believe this is the future course of the remainder of his life.”

Zubaydah was waterboarded two to four times a day for roughly three weeks and spent 266 hours (or 11 days) in a large “coffin size” box. “CIA interrogators told Zubaydah that the only way he would leave the facility was in the coffin-shaped confinement box,” the report said. “At times Zubaydah was described as ‘hysterical’ and ‘distressed to the level that he was unable to effectively communicate.” He did not provide any actionable intelligence throughout the time he was subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques, according to the report.

CIA records indicate that the treatment of Zubaydah “had a profound effect on all staff members present ... some to the point of tears and choking up.”

3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.