Do media treat Michelle Obama like the new Jackie Kennedy?

Not since Jackie's Camelot days in the Kennedy administration has a first lady so captured public attention and respectful coverage by much of the press. Unlike Jackie, Michelle Obama has got social media.

|
Jason Reed/Reuters
President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama wave from Air Force One before departing from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, July 2.

Will history judge first lady Michelle Obama to be a social media pioneer? We ask that because either Mrs. Obama herself or someone on her staff is doing a good job using new networked forms of communication to create positive publicity that reflects back on the White House itself.

Case in point: On Thursday, the first lady’s FLOTUS Twitter feed joined in the popular meme #ThrowbackThursday and tweeted out an arresting photo of Michelle and Barack in their early days together. The pair is hugging; she’s staring directly at the camera, while he’s sort of squinting and looking aside, as if he’s thinking about stuff, like becoming president, or maybe how long it is 'til lunch.

Retweets piled up. The photo went up on her Instagram account, too, where it was a huge hit, with more than 50,000 “hearts” in a day.

Yes, Ann Romney Instagrams, too, and did so during the 2012 campaign. It isn’t as if Michelle Obama is the only spouse of a national politician to venture into the world beyond Facebook. But she works them all together, linking it up with her appearances on non-hard-news television shows such as “Ellen" to produce an overall media strategy that bypasses the traditional media filter.

Even headlines about her are acquiring a new media sheen. On Friday, Politico’s Jennifer Epstein wrote a piece titled “Michelle Obama’s YOLO moment." (That’s “you only live once," in Twitter-speak.) The story’s premise was that the first lady, with her husband reelected, was enjoying lots of seize-the-moment experiences, such as lunching with U-2 frontman Bono, scolding hecklers, and posting decades-old personal photos.

“For this first lady, the second term is YOLO territory,” writes Ms. Epstein.

But here’s another question: Is Michelle Obama able to do all this without real scrutiny because the media are too easy on her?

In this regard, Politico’s “YOLO” story may have been the last straw for some conservatives. They feel it symbolizes the light-weight and credulous approach of much coverage of Mrs. Obama and her activities.

“Has any First Lady since Jackie Kennedy received press coverage as worshipful as Michelle Obama?” tweeted the plugged-in, right-leaning Byron York, chief political correspondent of the Washington Examiner, on Friday.

Mr. York linked to a Politico slide show of first-lady magazine covers that showed Mrs. Obama in glamorous poses.

Others on the right grumbled about the uncritical reception of the first lady’s “Kids’ State Dinner” this week, where she entertained winners of a school lunch healthy recipe contest.

It’s one thing to cover an event where one category of winner seemed to be “lettuce cups," and another to ignore that many kids just don’t want to eat that stuff, in this view.

As a “Daily Caller” story noted earlier this week, one New York State school district has decided to withdraw from a first lady-backed national school lunch program because the nutritional guidelines resulted in hungry students.

"The high schoolers especially complained the portion sizes were too small, and many more students brought in lunch from home," said Nicky Boehm, food service manager for the Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake school district, according to the Daily Caller.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Do media treat Michelle Obama like the new Jackie Kennedy?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2013/0712/Do-media-treat-Michelle-Obama-like-the-new-Jackie-Kennedy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe