Ted Nugent apologizes to President Obama. Sincere?

Rocker Ted Nugent apologized for calling President Obama a 'subhuman mongrel.' Then he posted dozens of tweets about the things he finds 'offensive' with the Obama administration.

|
Ron Baselice/The Dallas Morning News/AP
Three-month-old James Bodiford of Lavon, Texas, is photographed with rocker Ted Nugent, who is visiting with fans during a stop Feb. 20 at a local restaurant in Denton, Texas. Nugent and Texas gubernatorial candidate Greg Abbott stopped to promote early voting.

Ted Nugent has apologized for calling President Obama a “subhuman mongrel.” The shock rocker/political provocateur on Friday told conservative radio host and CNN commentator Ben Ferguson that he “did cross the line” with those words, uttered in an interview with Guns.com in January.

At first Nugent did not apologize directly to Mr. Obama himself. Instead, his main regret seemed to be that the controversy over his unrestrained rhetoric was affecting the man he campaigned with in Texas this week, state Attorney General and presumptive GOP gubernatorial candidate Greg Abbott, as well as other top GOP figures such as Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

“I apologize for using the term. I will try to elevate my vernacular to the level of those great men that I’m learning from in the world of politics,” said Nugent.

Pressed further, Nugent answered “yes” to the question about whether he was actually saying he was sorry to the president.

That doesn’t mean he’s changed his political views, though. He added that instead of “the street fighter terminology of ‘subhuman mongrel,’ ” he should have used more understandable words, such as “violator of his oath to the Constitution.”

The apology was also tempered somewhat by the fact that it followed an epic Twitter rant in which Nugent listed in great detail the many, many aspects of the Obama administration that he says he finds offensive.

“Are words really more offensive than 5 dead Americans on Obama’s watch?” Nugent tweeted early Friday morning. He then followed this “Are words really more offensive than …” pattern for another 40-plus tweets, ending the sentence with “a gunrunning attorney general,” “engineered recidivism,” “trampling the US constitution,” and “Obama Mao redistribution,” among other things.

We’d guess this means he and the president won’t be meeting over beverages in the White House for a quiet discussion of their respective political philosophies.

Nugent’s friends and allies in the GOP may have pressed him to take back his words to give Abbott and others a little breathing room. The Texas gubernatorial hopeful has been avoiding reporters’ questions about why he appeared with Nugent, and whether he agrees with Nugent’s sentiments.

Some Republicans have been even more direct – Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky denounced Nugent’s racially charged invective as “offensive” and “having no place in politics.” Sitting Texas Gov. Rick Perry told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he does “have a problem” with Nugent’s strong language.

Abbott is heavily favored to win the GOP Texas gubernatorial primary and a favorite to win the general election. In that context, the Nugent flap was an unwelcome distraction that allowed Democratic contender Wendy Davis an opportunity to change the subject from her own missteps. Press accounts have accused Ms. Davis of making her ascent from childhood poverty sound more difficult and dramatic than it really was.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ted Nugent apologizes to President Obama. Sincere?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0221/Ted-Nugent-apologizes-to-President-Obama.-Sincere
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe