Is Donald Trump winning his 'Red Queen's race'?

Donald Trump's decision not to participate in the Fox News debate is helping him maintain his domination of campaign news.

|
Mary Altaffer/AP
A Secret Service agent inspects the room ahead of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's arrival for a news conference at the Roundhouse Gymnasium in Marshalltown, Iowa, Jan. 26, 2016 – the same day he announced he would not participate in the upcoming Republican debate hosted by Fox News and Google.

Donald Trump’s refusal to participate in Thursday’s Fox News debate may or may not help his candidacy. It could be a brilliant move to avoid harsh face-to-face criticism from the rest of the GOP field. Or it might make him look cowardly, afraid to face the Fox anchor he’s angry with, Megyn Kelly.

But one thing seems clear: The unusual withdrawal is helping Mr. Trump, against all odds, to continue to win his Red Queen’s race.

In other words, it’s helping him maintain his domination of United States campaign news, despite the fact that doing so requires greater and greater effort as the days tick down toward Iowa’s caucuses.

The Red Queen race reference is to a scene in Chapter 2 of Lewis Carroll’s “Through the Looking Glass.” The Red Queen (a giant chess piece) and Alice are running hard, but staying in the same spot.

A panting Alice notes that where she comes from, such action generally moves one to a different place.

A slow sort of country!” [says] the Queen. “Now here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!”

Various authors have appropriated this scene as a metaphor for continual effort. Political scientist Jonathan Bernstein first applied it to The Donald back in December, noting that as time passes, Trump has to do more and more outrageous things to attract the same (disproportionate) share of US media attention.

Maintaining Trump’s accustomed “yyyuuuuugee” level of coverage would seem to be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain. But look at how he’s managed it in the days leading up to Iowa’s Feb. 1 vote: He’s rolled out a Sarah Palin endorsement. Catnip for columnists!

He’s hammered Ted Cruz on the latter’s Canadian birth, claiming he’s just raising questions and that Senator Cruz should clear it all up. The think pieces write themselves!

Then there’s Tuesday’s endorsement from Liberty University’s Jerry Falwell Jr., sparking yet more discussion of whether Trump has trumped Cruz in the crucial evangelical demographic.

By nightfall Trump was at it again, with the back-and-forth with Fox over the debate generating massive amounts of social media discussion.

Consciously or not, Trump is smothering the media coverage of many of his rivals at the moment they need it most. He has regained the lead in Iowa, according to some measures. The FiveThirtyEight polls-only forecast now gives him a 55 percent chance of winning the Hawkeye State caucuses.

The other Republicans in the race have noticed this rise and the related symbiosis between Trump and the press, and they’re not happy about it.

“I think, you know, the media’s been handled by him,” said New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in a Fox interview Tuesday.

Will Trump’s outrageousness convince future presidential hopefuls that one-upmanship is a viable path to the nomination? If so, his withdrawal from a debate could end up as a turning point in US campaign history – as was the first such televised debate, which taught politicians that the tan, debonair demeanor of John F. Kennedy could win more votes than the wan appearance of Richard Nixon.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is Donald Trump winning his 'Red Queen's race'?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0127/Is-Donald-Trump-winning-his-Red-Queen-s-race
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe