Does Rubio have to quit for GOP to beat Trump?

Sen. Marco Rubio's fall to last place in the Republican field means the GOP needs another strategy to beat its billionaire front-runner.

|
Paul Sancya/AP
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida greets patrons at the Melao Bakery in Kissimmee, Fla. Senator Rubio has said he's sticking around must-win Florida ahead of the state's Republican primary on March 15.

The Republican establishment – that vague group of lawmakers, lobbyists, donors, and thinkfluencers atop the national party – believed in Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida, once. Only a few weeks ago, they thought the young Floridian was their best chance to block Donald Trump and defeat the Democrats in the fall.

Actual GOP voters did not agree. Senator Rubio never had a base of core supporters, points out FiveThirtyEight poll data guru Nate Silver. He was everybody’s second choice (at best). Now he’s dropped to last in the Republican field and is facing a possible humiliating loss on March 15 in his home state.

Having won only 9.3 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s Michigan primary, and 5 percent in Mississippi, the Florida senator has reached a turning point. Perhaps it’s time for him to drop out of the race.

“Pressure on Rubio to pull out will grow exponentially. Two very poor finishes,” tweeted Forbes chairman Steve Forbes, himself a failed Republican presidential candidate, after the devastating results rolled in.

Call it the John Connally problem. Mr. Connally was a conservative Democrat-turned-Republican who for a time seemed the GOP’s best hope to take back the White House following the Watergate scandal.

Connally was a dynamic speaker who looked like a president. He’d been secretary of the Navy under John F. Kennedy. As governor of Texas, he was riding in the limousine when JFK was shot. He’d served as secretary of the Treasury under Richard Nixon. He had ample campaign money. Heading into the 1980 campaign, he looked like a strong competitor.

But “looked” is the important word there. Real voters did not get the message. Connally ran into an insurgent force in the person of Ronald Reagan, and he spent $11 million in 1979 dollars to win just one delegate. Connally’s name became synonymous with political underperformance.

Rubio’s name might join him in that dubious pantheon. It is true that a week is a long time in politics, but what will change to allow Rubio to rebound in the Sunshine State? At the moment, he’s 17 points behind Mr. Trump in the RealClearPolitics rolling average of major Florida polls.

A barrage of anti-Trump ads might help. Independent super PACs opposed to the real estate billionaire are planning some $10 million in TV spending in Florida in coming days. That’s a lot of money. Rubio’s own campaign will probably empty its wallet as well.

But that effort could help Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas as much as Rubio. Senator Cruz is creeping up behind Rubio in Florida polls. The Texan’s stronger performance on Tuesday could convince anti-Trump Floridians that he, not Rubio, is their best hope.

So what if Rubio dropped out – and then joined Cruz as VP on a ticket? That’s conservative commentator Erick Erickson’s scenario for defeating Trump. Rubio will have no political future if he persists with a presidential run, since he’ll essentially be playing the role of spoiler and guaranteeing a Trump win, according to Mr. Erickson. Better to accept a lesser role to unite anti-Trump forces.

“It can be done. It is possible. But the Marco Rubio supporters have to dare to believe and be willing to set aside grievances with Cruz to win,” writes Erickson on Wednesday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Does Rubio have to quit for GOP to beat Trump?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0309/Does-Rubio-have-to-quit-for-GOP-to-beat-Trump
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe