John Boehner stirs up Washington with 'Lucifer' comment

A comment by former House Speaker John Boehner is a reminder of two things: the personal still matters in politics, and Ted Cruz hasn't played that game well.

|
Darron Cummings/AP
Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz speaks during a campaign stop in Indianapolis on April 27.

Former Speaker of the House John Boehner is not a Ted Cruz fan. Boehner called the Texas senator “Lucifer in the flesh” on Wednesday during an appearance at Stanford University.

You read that right. This is the recently retired leader of all House Republicans talking about someone who still has an outside chance of winning his party’s presidential nomination and is the establishment’s only real hope of stopping Donald Trump.

Apparently, Mr. Boehner has said this before in other settings, but this time the reference has roiled Washington’s chattering social media. On Wednesday, as reported by the Stanford Daily, he expounded on the theme a bit, adding, “I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable [expletive] in my life.”

If nothing else, this shows that in the partisan, fast-paced and social-media drenched world of modern Washington, the personal still matters.

For years, Senator Cruz made Boehner’s life miserable, politically speaking. The two men are in the same party, but members of very different factions.

Boehner was the essential inside politico, someone who worked his way up to the top job step by step. Cruz is an elected lawmaker, but still an outsider, someone who pushes his own party leadership in directions it does not want to go. Cruz encouraged rebel GOP House members to challenge Boehner’s decisions. Eventually Boehner decided he’d had enough conflict and it was better for everyone for him to step aside.

In that way, Cruz won.

But now, Cruz actually needs the Republican establishment’s help. He’s the candidate best positioned to block Mr. Trump – someone many in the party consider an apostate – from winning the nomination. Boehner’s words show how much of a struggle it may be for many in the party’s elected top ranks to rally around their unlikely champion.

Once upon a time, of course, Washington didn’t work this way.

It’s a pundit truism that back in the day, when Republican President Ronald Reagan and Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill could sit back and swap bad jokes after a long day’s work, Washington worked better. The parties could strike deals. Compromise was made easier by personal relationships, which built trust.

Today? Forget it. Lawmakers work long hours. They go home to families, not work gatherings. Partisanship precludes much interaction between opponents.

That’s the way this trope runs, in any case.

Perhaps that’s overblown. Interaction on political and party matters may still be fertile ground for people – friends and frenemies alike – to get to know each other.

But Cruz has embodied the new Washington-as-dysfunctional trope in many ways. He’s brought a scorched-earth policy to Capitol Hill and spent little time building relationships among the people that hold the power.

That has only emphasized his personal brand. He’s long argued that GOP insiders are selling out the party’s grass roots.

But it’s indicative that only four fellow Republican have endorsed Cruz for president.

Poised on the verge of what could be the most important few weeks of his political life, Cruz is standing on his scorched earth largely alone.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to John Boehner stirs up Washington with 'Lucifer' comment
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0428/John-Boehner-stirs-up-Washington-with-Lucifer-comment
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe