Skip to footer

Why Trump could pick a running mate who called him 'know-nothing'

As Donald Trump looks to pick a vice president, some Republicans are lining up – even if they weren't supportive in the past. 

|
Jose Luis Magana/AP/File
Texas Gov. Rick Perry speaks at an event in Washington in this file photo.

Yes, House Speaker Paul Ryan’s not sure yet whether he’ll support Donald Trump. Former Presidents George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush aren’t going to the Republican National Convention. Sen. Lindsey Graham isn’t either – the former GOP presidential hopeful announced on Friday that he won’t vote for Donald Trump (or Hillary Clinton) in the fall.

But this doesn’t mean all Republican luminaries are recoiling from the prospect of a Trump general election run. Far from it. Some are all but waving their hands in the air, trying to catch The Donald’s eye as he looks around for a running mate. “Pick me! Pick me!”

Take Rick Perry. The former Texas governor criticized Trump harshly in a speech last July. “Donald Trump is the modern day incarnation of the know-nothing movement,” Mr. Perry said.

Circumstances change. Perry went nowhere. Trump won. On Thursday, Perry said he’d support the real estate billionaire and do all he can to help him beat likely Democratic nominee Mrs. Clinton.

“He is not a perfect man. But what I do believe is that he loves this country and he will surround himself with capable, experienced people and he will listen to them,” Perry told CNN.

Asked if he would serve as vice president, Perry said he’d be able to help in any way he can. “I am not going to say no,” said the Texan.

Then there’s Newt Gingrich. The former House speaker has been a fairly constant defender of Trump in the media since the campaign began. Though to be fair, Mr. Gingrich has defended pretty much every GOP hopeful at one time or another. In any case he may be waging a behind-the-scenes effort on the part of a Trump VP hopeful: himself.

His name has popped up on lists of possible running mates. Some Trump advisers acknowledge that they’ve noticed and appreciated Newt’s support.

“It has become apparent that Gingrich is waging an active campaign to become Donald Trump’s running mate,” wrote Myra Adams of the right-leaning National Review earlier this week.

What this shows is that politics can be a complicated game of shifting alliances. Yesterday’s foe is today’s friend; someone who appears philosophically incompatible may be a compatriot for reasons of his or her own. Ambition and ideology are constant, expected, and unpredictable. That’s one reason politics is like chess played in 3-D.

Might Trump pick either man? It’s not out of the question. He’s said he wants an experienced politician and both qualify there. Perry might have the edge – he’s served in office more recently. He’s a conservative, and as Speaker Ryan’s hesitance shows, that’s a faction Trump may need to mollify.

Others may be higher on the list, though. Trump’s said he wants to vet recent rival John Kasich. South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley has said “no thanks” but Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin says she supports Trump “100 percent” and would be honored to be his running mate. 

In the end it may not make much difference in November. As the Monitor’s Francine Kiefer wrote earlier this week, “Even a carefully chosen running mate isn’t likely to make or break ... campaigns, which will rise or fall mostly on their merits.”

But the decision can help around the margins – and it does give voters a useful look at a candidate’s thinking process, Ms. Kiefer adds.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Why Trump could pick a running mate who called him 'know-nothing'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0506/Why-Trump-could-pick-a-running-mate-who-called-him-know-nothing
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe