Mike Simpson: the guy who ended the manufactured crisis over DHS funding

Mike Simpson knows how Congress works. The only way to rein in the president is to come up with a bipartisan plan or, at least, a plan to force Democrats to vote with you and not against you.  

|
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Rep. Mike Simpson (R) of Idaho (3rd from l.) stands with a group of bipartisan members of Congress at a news conference on debt-limit negotiations on Capitol Hill on Nov. 16, 2011. From left are, Sen. Mike Crapo (R) of Idaho, Sen. Kent Conrad (D) of North Dakota, Congressman Simpson, Rep. Heath Shuler (D) of North Carolina, Sen. Joe Manchin (D) of W.V., Sen. Mark Warner (D) of Virginia, and House minority whip Steny Hoyer of Md.

When John Boehner needed a member to step up and take a leadership role in bringing the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill to the House floor this week, his friend Mike Simpson volunteered.

Simpson, a former Speaker of the House in the Idaho State Legislature, knows about leadership. He knows how hard it is to manage a sometimes rambunctious legislative branch and he knows how doing the right thing is not always the same thing as doing the popular thing.

Simpson also knows how to communicate to his constituents about the importance of effective governance. He has effectively used his perch on the Appropriations Committee to battle off the regulatory overreach of the Obama administration and its Departments of Interior and the EPA.

Simpson is not immune to tempestuous nature of the Republican base. He faced a stiff primary challenge, funded mostly by folks from outside Idaho who have interests that diverge sharply from the conservative constituency. The Club for Growth, funded by a libertarian activist named Peter Thiel, poured a million dollars into the race against Simpson. The Madison Project, another shadowy outside group, hired a pro-pot legalization activist to work to defeat the long-time appropriator.

They were working to elect a trial lawyer who had lobbied against tort reform and who owned a debt-collection business to replace Simpson, who had tried to lead the Congress last year in finding a way to deal with our burgeoning debt.

Simpson understood that to get deal on a truly necessary budget package, both sides would have to give.  Democrats would have to give on entitlement spending. Republicans would have to give on tax increases. That was only way to get a deal, and Simpson was pushing leaders on both sides to get something done.

That’s why the Club for Growth decided to attack him. His former colleague, Chris Chocola, whose voting record in the House was much more moderate than Mike Simpson’s voting record, attacked the Idaho Congressman for being too squishy.

But to a guy who used to search for cavities for a living, (he is a dentist), Mike Simpson is not going to leave the dirty work to somebody else. And to carry the metaphor a bit further, he understand instinctively that short-term pain (like getting your teeth cleaned or pulling out a bad tooth) yields long-time gain

So, I guess it is not surprising to see Mike Simpson stand up and be the guy to end this manufactured crisis on funding for the Homeland Security Department.

This never was the smartest of strategies – to detach DHS from the rest of the Appropriations process, in order to get the president to somehow sign a repeal of his executive order. But I suppose it is far better to threaten to close down a small part of the government rather than the whole government.

Simpson’s colleagues need a refresher course on how Congress works and how it interacts with the White House. Partisanship makes the legislative branch much more ineffective as an institution, and when members of the so-called “Freedom Caucus” make bold, vivid, and somewhat ridiculous speeches about how the president has broken the Constitution irreparably by just waking up in the morning, they should understand that the more impassioned they become, the less effective they are.

The only way to rein in the president is to come up with a bipartisan plan or, at least, a plan to force Democrats to vote with you and not against you.  Beating your fists against your chest, threatening to hold your breath until your face turns blue, or worse, threatening to shut the government down, simply doesn’t work.

Mike Simpson knows how Congress works, he knows how to rein in an out-of-control White House, and he knows how to craft bipartisan compromises that move the ball forward for the American people.

Mike has once again taken a leadership position for the good of the country, and my guess is that he will once again become a target for the haters. If you can, and you are not one of the haters, you should do all that you can to support him.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mike Simpson: the guy who ended the manufactured crisis over DHS funding
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0305/Mike-Simpson-the-guy-who-ended-the-manufactured-crisis-over-DHS-funding
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe