Why was the Florida GOP debate audience so subdued?

Debate audiences have provided some of the most memorable moments of the campaign so far. But the Florida GOP debate crowd produced only occasional polite applause.

|
Brian Snyder/Reuters
The audience listens to the presidential candidates during the Florida GOP debate in Tampa, Fla., Monday.

What happened? Anyone tuning in to Monday night’s GOP presidential debate hoping for a raucous smackdown with lusty cheers and jeers from the audience would have been sorely disappointed.

Apparently the crowd in Tampa, Fla., just wasn’t that into it. Or so it seemed, judging by the deafening silence, punctuated by occasional polite applause.

Moderator Brian Williams of NBC is only partly to blame. He noted at the outset that the invited guests had been asked to “withhold their applause” and “any verbal reactions to what they hear onstage.” But such guidance hasn’t stopped the audience before, NBC’s Chuck Todd noted Tuesday morning.

The debate audiences, in fact, have provided some of the most memorable moments of the campaign so far. Who, after all, can forget the audience that booed the gay soldier? Or cheered on Newt Gingrich when he went after Juan Williams of Fox News for suggesting that calling Barack Obama the “food stamp president” is racist? Or shouted “yes!” when Ron Paul was asked if people without health insurance should be allowed to die?

Typically, debate audiences are populated by supporters of the candidates, plus invitees of the host institution, in this case the University of South Florida. Among the attendees Monday were the British and French ambassadors to the United States, Sir Peter Westmacott and François Delattre. Perhaps, as well-behaved diplomats, they set the tone. Or maybe after 17 debates, everybody’s getting a little weary of all the arguing.

Monday night, in reports from the postdebate spin room, Mr. Gingrich’s team complained about the muzzled audience, when asked why the former House speaker seemed off his game. Team Romney took the opposite view, applauding the lack of applause as a dignified display worthy of such a lofty enterprise.

Here’s our take: When they’re going to hold a debate that goes way past our bedtime, we need a little something to keep our eyes open – especially when the talk turns to sugar subsidies and Sarbanes-Oxley. Skip the soporific routine, and put a little juice back in the game.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why was the Florida GOP debate audience so subdued?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0124/Why-was-the-Florida-GOP-debate-audience-so-subdued
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe