Newt Gingrich on Super Tuesday: Time for a (third) resurgence?

It could be Newt Gingrich's big day: His home state of Georgia votes, and he looks certain to win it by a big margin. Moreover, he's surging in polls in some other states voting on Super Tuesday.

|
Evan Vucci/AP
Newt Gingrich speaks in Duluth, Ga., Tuesday. If the Republican presidential candidate and former House Speaker experiences a Super Tuesday resurgence, it would be his third.

Most eyes are on Mitt Romney on Tuesday – the favorite for the GOP nomination heading into the Super Tuesday voting and almost certainly still the favorite at the end of the night.

But Newt Gingrich may have an interesting role to play, too – as either spoiler or as distant contender for the conservative Romney alternative.

If Tuesday is the beginning of a Gingrich resurgence, it will be the third for the former House speaker. He first spiked in popularity in early December (after having been written off as a candidate by most political observers last summer) and then surged again around his unexpected win in South Carolina on Jan. 21.

Since then, however, Mr. Gingrich's numbers have sunk – and South Carolina is still the only state he's won. Rick Santorum – especially after his trio of wins in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri on Feb. 7 – has taken over the mantle of the conservative contender.

But Tuesday is Gingrich's big day: His home state of Georgia votes (and with 76 delegates, is the biggest prize of the night), and he looks certain to win it by a big margin. CNN has already called the state for Gingrich based on exit polls.  

Moreover, he's surging in polls in some other states voting on Tuesday. He's gaining ground in Tennessee and could end up getting a number of delegates from both Tennessee and Oklahoma, even if he doesn't win either state.

Gingrich's own prediction, on Fox News on Monday, may be a bit optimistic. He told Sean Hannity, "I think we're clearly going to carry Georgia by a margin four or five times the size of Mitt Romney's margin in Michigan."

He continued, "We're surging here in Tennessee, we're surging with J.C. Watts's leadership in Oklahoma, we have a good chance to pick up some delegates in Ohio. We see some opportunities in North Dakota, Idaho, even in Massachusetts, where conservative Republicans regard Romney as a liberal governor, and there is a faction that would like to split. Not a majority, but a faction."

It's certainly possible that Gingrich could have a better-than-expected night, and he could even earn more delegates than Mr. Santorum. The nomination battle then moves into several states – Kansas, Alabama, and Mississippi – where Gingrich could have a decent shot.

All of which may still not put him on the path to the nomination. It's hard to see Gingrich, at this point, making up enough ground to topple Romney. But it could give him more justification to continue his fight (he has already vowed that he's in it until the end). And it could make him a factor in the race, primarily in hurting Santorum's chances.

Just as Gingrich is surging, Santorum is seeing much of his support sagging. He needs a good night on Tuesday to prove that his earlier victories weren't a fluke.

The candidate that may have the most to gain by a Gingrich surge: Romney.

As long as Santorum and Gingrich remain in the race, duking it out with each other for the mantle of "true conservative," Romney lacks a solid opponent. The far right's inability to coalesce around an anti-Romney candidate may end up being the boost that Romney has needed to claim the nomination, despite an apparent lack of enthusiasm.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Newt Gingrich on Super Tuesday: Time for a (third) resurgence?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0306/Newt-Gingrich-on-Super-Tuesday-Time-for-a-third-resurgence
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe