Biggest Super Bowl shocker: a tight end could determine who wins

In 50 years, the position of tight end has been revolutionized – to the point that the health of Rob Gronkowski could be central to the New England Patriots' chances to win the Super Bowl.   

|
Mark Humphrey/AP
New England Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski answers a question during Media Day for NFL football's Super Bowl XLVI Tuesday in Indianapolis.

This Super Bowl Sunday, the most important factor determining whether the New England Patriots or New York Giants walk away with the Lombardi trophy might not be a quarterback, a coach, or a defense. It might be the health of a tight end. 

New England Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski, who scored the most touchdowns in the NFL this season, is day to day with a left ankle injury, and it probably won’t be clear until Sunday if he can play. If he can’t, the Patriots quarterback Tom Brady loses his biggest offensive weapon, and the Patriots – though still dangerous – clearly become easier to defend.

That a tight end could be a Super Bowl team's second most important player is a measure of how much the position has changed in the past 50 years. Long the bellwether of football evolution, tight ends are the Swiss Army knives of an offense. First used primarily as extra linemen, they have now become receivers in their own right, combining a lineman's size, a running back's speed, and hands as soft as the best wide receivers.

In short, the best of them present defensive coordinators with no-win propositions: Cover them with linebackers who are too slow or defensive backs who are too small?

This year, the 6-foot, 5-inch, 265-pound slab of a man called “Gronk” had 90 catches for 1,327 yards and 17 touchdowns – a record at the tight end position. But he's just one part of the evolution.

In New Orleans, Saints tight end Jimmy Graham had a banner year right along with Gronkowski – both men broke Kellen Winslow’s 31-year-old single-season record for receiving yards (1,290) on the same day. In San Francisco, Vernon Davis co-led the NFL in touchdown receptions in 2009 and was one of the biggest playmakers this year on a team that finished one game short of the Super Bowl.

It marks a radical departure from when the position first came into being a half-century ago, as football teams started using separate squads for offense and defense. Then, the tight end was primarily used as an extra blocker – someone who could serve on an offensive line but also have enough athleticism to protect against the blitz from faster defensive backs.  

In the 1960s, Chicago Bear Mike Ditka became one of the first tight ends to pose a legitimate threat as a short pass receiver, amassing 5,800 yards and 43 touchdowns over a 12-year career.

Since Ditka, as the NFL has shifted more toward quarterback-centric offenses, the role of a tight end has shifted, too. Playing for the San Diego Chargers in the 1980s, Winslow was among the first tight ends fast enough to run long wide receiver routes. That trend continued in the 1990s with the Denver BroncosShannon Sharpe, the first tight end to amass 10,000 yards receiving in his career.

Today, the tight end tandem of Gronkowski and teammate Aaron Hernandez has become integral to the Patriots’ offense. The two had more combined receiving yards than any tight end duo in NFL history.

Between them, they create even more permutations for defensive matchup problems: The smallish, quick Hernandez is essentially a wide receiver deployed from a wide array of positions. Patriots coach Bill Belichick sometimes uses him as a receiver running routes and sometimes as a running back lining up behind Brady. 

So, Gronk or no Gronk, how do the Giants beat the Patriot tight ends on Sunday?

They may not have to; the Giants didn’t shut down Gronkowski or Hernandez when they beat the Patriots in November, but the pass rush did shut down Brady. If Brady doesn't have time to connect with them, Gronkowski and Hernandez can’t be nearly as devastating as they have been all year. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Biggest Super Bowl shocker: a tight end could determine who wins
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Sports/2012/0203/Biggest-Super-Bowl-shocker-a-tight-end-could-determine-who-wins
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe