Skip to footer

NFL draft: 5 reasons it is must-see TV

All the hullabaloo surrounding the NFL draft can be a bit baffling to the uninitiated. After all, Commissioner Roger Goodell just walks onstage, calls a name, and then shakes a hand. Hardly gripping stuff. Yet in 2010, the first round garnered more viewers than two NBA playoff games scheduled at the same time. 

So why is the NFL draft such a big draw? Here are five reasons:

1. ESPN knows football

Diane Bondareff/AP
Mel Kiper Jr. would know which Subway sandwich top prospect Robert Griffin III makes best.

  • By Schuyler Velasco Correspondent

On one hand, the NFL draft is merely evidence of football’s domination of the American sports landscape. Other evidence (as if it is needed): national signing day for high schoolers is televised, as is the selection show for college football's postseason Bowl Championship Series. Need we even mention the Super Bowl? This year, it (again) set the record for the most-watched television program in American history with 111.3 million viewers.

Suffice it to say, Americans will watch just about anything pigskin-related. Add to that ESPN's ability to turn even poker into gripping television, and you have a ratings winner. Host Chris Berman, ever infectious, provides the soundtrack, backed by endless experts. ESPN draft analyst Mel Kiper Jr. has become a cult figure, providing exhaustive context even for seventh-round punters from San Diego State.

“ESPN's coverage of yesterday's National Football League draft proved one thing: that a record-length near-five-hour first round replete with talking heads need not be a sleepathon,” Richard Sandomir wrote for The New York Times in 1991, and little has changed.

The thoroughness of the coverage raises the stakes and makes the entire draft seem only slightly less important than the Oslo Accords.

1 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.