Boston Marathon: five runners and why they'll be at the starting line

Here are the stories of five runners to whom the Boston Marathon belongs. They're running a race that has long been a 26.2-mile-long stage for this city's pride, but this year will be all the more so.

3. Sharon Cherop, Iten, Kenya

Brian Snyder/Reuters/File
‘I know there is a strong team this time around. But even last time it was strong. I trust myself. I trust my training.’ – Sharon Cherop

Sharon Cherop is part of the so-called elite field for the Boston Marathon. These runners, who will vie for the championship medals, hail from a dozen countries and numbered 46 as of March 3. Ms. Cherop, a Kenyan, won the women's race in 2012.

Last year in Boston, she placed third. In fact, she crossed the finish line so far ahead of the bombings that she was already back at her hotel and in the shower when she found out what happened. "I heard something on the TV outside of the bathroom," she says. "People were crying outside, and then we realized it was a bomb blast."

Her father, husband, and children had come all the way from Marakwet, her hometown in Kenya's Rift Valley, to cheer for her. "I thanked God we were all safe," Cherop says. "We just prayed ... for the families who lost relatives."

She says it was never a question whether she would return this year.

"Boston is like a home to me," she says. "It's really important for me even after that incident that I go to the same place, the same road."

The Boston Marathon has been an annual highlight for Cherop. In her 2011 debut, she took third, and for her 2012 win she posted a time of 2:31:50. Her third-place finish last year was 36 seconds behind the women's winner, fellow Kenyan Rita Jeptoo.

Cherop and Ms. Jeptoo will both be part of this year's field, which the BAA is calling the fastest ever assembled for the race.

Kenya is sending a powerful team. Six of the top 10 seeded women are from the East African nation, plus seven of the top 20 men.

As a veteran of the Boston race, Cherop says she's confident.

"I know there is a strong team this time around," she says. "But even last time it was strong. I trust myself. I trust my training."

Her goal, she says, is to reach the podium.

Again.

– Jason Patinkin, correspondent

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.