For once, Indianapolis Colts profit from Peyton Manning's playoff heartache

The Indianapolis Colts dominated former Colt Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos, 24-13, adding to Manning's playoff woes and throwing his future into doubt.

|
Chris Humphreys/USA Today
Denver Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning talks with defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio at the end of the fourth quarter in their loss to the Indianapolis Colts at Sports Authority Field at Mile High in Denver.

At some point in the fourth quarter, waiting for the Denver Bronco rally that never came, the realization dawned about how perversely the tables have turned for Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis Colts.

On their way to a 24-13 win that wasn't as close as the score indicated, the Colts were doing to Peyton Manning what opposing teams had so long done to him when he was a Colt.

They were making you wonder why the team that had looked so much better in the regular season was losing.

They were making you wonder where the Hall of Fame quarterback had gone.

They were bouncing his team from the playoffs before he had even won a game for the record ninth time.

For the 53 Colts on the current roster, the win will mean only one thing: A pass to Foxborough, Mass., next Sunday for what will surely be a harder game against the New England Patriots to get to the Super Bowl. But for the city of Indianapolis itself, the remarkable rise of new quarterback Andrew Luck will come with the smallest drop of gall for how brutally the Colts subjected his predecessor to yet another playoff heartache.

The excuses this time, it would seem, are different. The Peyton Manning who took the field Sunday in Denver looked like just the battered remnants of the man who took the Broncos to the Super Bowl so spectacularly last year – much less the man who began this season looking almost as promising.

The questions after the game were whether this would be the last game for a legend whose body appears to be falling further and further out of step with his mind. Manning himself could not answer them, saying only that he needed to think about it. 

But there would be a symmetry in that, beaten in his last game by the team that he built, beaten in his last game in the circumstances that, in many ways, have become as much a part of his legacy as his martial two-minute drills or maestro-like pre-snap orchestrations behind center. 

Of course, there have been good times for Manning in the playoffs. His Colts teams won the Super Bowl in 2006 and lost in the Super Bowl in 2009. And the narrative that quarterbacks lead their teams singlehandedly to Super Bowl titles is woefully simplistic.

But there is no denying that his Broncos are a more talented team than the Colts this year – and by some margin. The Colts defense became the first in National Football League history to allow a 500-yard passer and 200-yard rusher in the same season. Against the best teams, the Colts pass rush looked like scrawny arms Rob Lowe. And Colts No. 1 running back Trent Richardson – the man for whom they traded a No. 1 draft pick last year – has been so ineffective that they benched him Sunday. (His replacement, Daniel "Boom" Herron, was drafted 188 spots below him in the 2012 draft.)

Manning alone cannot account for why his more-talented team was so thoroughly outplayed. The Broncos fearsome pass-rushing duo, DeMarcus Ware and Von Miller, never got close enough to Luck to even reach out a finger and muss up his neck beard.

But the narrative has played out too many times for Manning's liking – the underdog moves on, Manning stays home. 

In this case, it is Luck and the Colts that are moving on, and despite the Colts' many flaws, there is a feeling that Luck has climbed another rung on the Super Bowl ladder. The next, in New England, is likely to be tougher. The Patriots are a tag team operation, with Tom Brady doing the bidding of all things from the diabolical mind of Lord Belichick.

But Sunday, Luck gave Indianapolis fans a taste of truly new era, winning a game his team had no business winning – and certainly not in such convincing fashion. That it came in this game, against this quarterback, made it at once more poignant and more painful.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to For once, Indianapolis Colts profit from Peyton Manning's playoff heartache
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Sports/2015/0112/For-once-Indianapolis-Colts-profit-from-Peyton-Manning-s-playoff-heartache
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe