Tsarnaev judge jettisons 'betrayal' of US as grounds for death penalty

The US district judge in Boston called the prosecution's argument 'obnoxious.' Lawyers for Dzokhar Tsarnaev, meanwhile, filed a motion asking to move the Marathon bombing trial out of Massachusetts.

|
John Taggart/REUTERS
Police escort residents from their home as they move towards a police assault on a house on Franklin Street in Watertown, Massachusetts April 19, 2013. The manhunt for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, one of two brothers believed to have carried out the Boston Marathon four days prior.

“Betrayal of the United States” is not a legitimate factor in determining whether or not Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should receive the death penalty, a US district judge ruled Wednesday, adding that the government had other legitimate grounds to seek his execution.

In a court filing in May, US Attorney Carmen Ortiz had cited national “betrayal” as one of the reasons the prosecution was seeking a death sentence. Mr. Tsarnaev “received asylum from the United States; obtained citizenship and enjoyed freedoms of a United States citizen; and then betrayed his allegiance to the United States by killing and maiming people,” read the motion.

US District Judge George O’Toole Jr. called this argument “obnoxious,” and the distinction made by prosecutors between naturalized and native-born citizens “inappropriate.”

“It’s unduly prejudicial, and I will strike it,” he said. “Only the former take an oath.”

Judge O’Toole did not rule out the death penalty altogether, however. He noted that the prosecution had cited several other legitimate reasons for pursuing capital punishment in their filing in May, including Tsarnaev’s alleged lack of remorse and substantial planning and premeditation.

“Aggravating factors that are not obnoxious in that sense are adequate for the government’s purpose,” O’Toole said, according to the Boston Globe.

Also Wednesday, defense lawyers filed a motion asking to move the trial out of Massachusetts, in which they said there is “an overwhelming presumption of guilt” according to a survey they conducted in May.

Massachusetts, where the bombing took place, has a complicated relationship with the death penalty – at least when it comes to Tsarnaev.

In May 2013, shortly after the Marathon bombings, a University of Massachusetts poll found that 59 percent of Bay State residents supported the death penalty for the suspect, while only 50 percent supported capital punishment in general – a number that dropped to 37 percent in a more recent UMass poll this May.

This is a tension present in the rhetoric of many Massachusetts politicians: Boston Mayor Marty Walsh (D), US Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D), gubernatorial candidate Juliette Kayyem (D), and Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) have all expressed their opposition to the death penalty, but have remained noncommittal on its application to the Tsarnaev case. Mayor Walsh even said he supported the “process” that led US Attorney General Eric Holder to seek the death penalty in the Tsarnaev case, despite his personal opposition to it.

In addition to the death penalty charge, the court Wednesday also discussed allegedly inappropriate interviews granted by investigators and prosecutors to the media, including one by former FBI Special Agent in Charge Richard DesLauriers, who spoke to CBS for a documentary.

Judge O’Toole declined to pass any formal judgments about the matter, but expressed frustration with the prosecution’s conduct.

“I was not very happy about it,” O’Toole said of the television appearances.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tsarnaev judge jettisons 'betrayal' of US as grounds for death penalty
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2014/0618/Tsarnaev-judge-jettisons-betrayal-of-US-as-grounds-for-death-penalty
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe