BP to pay Gulf states $18.7 billion in Deepwater Horizon disaster settlement

The payments will be doled out over 18 years to settle environmental and economic damage claims as well as support restoration efforts along the Gulf Coast.

BP has agreed to pay $18.7 billion to settle all government claims that have arisen from the massive 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill which released 120 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

In the wake of the spill, which ranks as one of the worst environmental disasters in US history, BP faced litigation from four states as well as more than 400 local government entities.

The $18.7 billion – paid out over 18 years – will be divvied up among Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and local governments to settle environmental and economic damage claims as well as support restoration efforts along the Gulf Coast.

The settlement comes as a federal judge was preparing to rule on how much in penalties the British oil giant owed for violating the federal Clean Water Act. Arguing against the fines, BP had said it already had to pay out more than $40 billion because of the spill.

Last year a federal court ruled that the company was guilty of “gross negligence” in the disaster and therefore 67 percent responsible for the spill and explosion which killed 11 people. The final phase of the litigation ended earlier this year when a federal court gave BP $4,300-per-barrel penalty for the spill, the maximum allowable under the law, amounting to $13.7 billion total.

The Clean Water Act penalties were based on BP’s appeal of these decisions.

Costs incurred by BP so far include an estimated $14 billion for response and cleanup and $4.5 billion in penalties announced after a settlement of a criminal case with the government.

In 2012, BP reached a settlement with individuals and businesses over economic and property damage claims arising from the spill. It is still unclear exactly how much the company will have to pay due to this settlement.

According to environmental scientists it could take decades before the health of the Gulf Coast is restored. A National Wildlife Federation's (NWF) report released last year gave a list of 47 projects and recommendations to help the process along and pointed to BP fines and penalties to fund them.

“Five years later, wildlife in the Gulf are still feeling the impacts of the oil spill,” said NWF president and CEO Collin O’Mara in a news release. “The science is clear that this is not over – and sea turtles, dolphins, fish, and birds are still suffering from the fallout. Holding BP fully accountable and using all fines and penalties to restore the Gulf of Mexico must be a national priority.”

Researchers are still discovering subtle effects on the Gulf Coast’s environment and animals a half-decade after the spill. A study published in April in the journal PLOS One linked the spill to an increasing number of bottle-nosed dolphin deaths in the area affected by the disaster.

“Studies have increasingly pointed to the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons as being the most significant cause of the illnesses and deaths plaguing the Gulf’s dolphin population,” said Teri Rowles, head of NOAA’s Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to BP to pay Gulf states $18.7 billion in Deepwater Horizon disaster settlement
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0702/BP-to-pay-Gulf-states-18.7-billion-in-Deepwater-Horizon-disaster-settlement
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe