Skip to footer

After Chattanooga shooting, Trump calls for Marines to carry guns

In the wake of the deadly Chattanooga shooting, Donald Trump has advocated for Marines to carry guns at military centers.

|
Dominick Reuter/Reuters
Businessman and Republican candidate for president Donald Trump greets supporters as he arrives at a campaign event in Laconia, New Hampshire, July 16, 2015.

Four US Marines were killed at the Navy Operational Support Center and Marine Corps Reserve Center in Chattanooga, Tenn., by a gunman Thursday morning. Police identified the attacker as Kuwaiti-born Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, who was also killed at the scene. The attack occurred in a “gun-free zone,” which has led 2016 GOP presidential hopeful Donald Trump to question why the Marines were unable to carry weapons at a military center.

"These are four great Marines ... and that they're not allowed to carry guns is absolutely ridiculous," Trump told Fox News's Bill O’Reilly Thursday.

The US Department of Defense's current regulations on carrying firearms stipulate, “The authorization to carry firearms shall be issued only to qualified personnel when there is a reasonable expectation that life or DoD assets will be jeopardized if firearms are not carried.”

A 2014 Gallup poll indicates that American sentiment toward gun ownership has changed since 2000. Last year, 63 percent of Americans believed that owning a gun at home made the home safer, while in 2000 only 35 percent of those surveyed agreed that gun ownership led to increased home safety.

The debate over the effectiveness of gun-free zones in the United States often comes to the fore after high-profile shooting incidents. After a 2013 Navy Yard shooting in Washington, D.C., gun advocates claimed that the limited availability of firearms in the yard's gun-free zone enabled the killer to take more lives. A recent incident in Garland, Texas, in which two armed men were killed at a "draw Mohammed" contest prompted criticisms from defenders of gun rights about gun-free zones.

But according to  Mark Follman, writing in Mother Jones, there is no evidence that gun-free zones create opportunities for violent attacks.

Among the 62 mass shootings over the last 30 years that we studied, not a single case includes evidence that the killer chose to target a place because it banned guns.

And according to gun control advocates Everytown, only 17% of mass shootings take place in gun-free zones.

"We have our recruiting centers set up in places easily accessible to the public. For example, a strip mall. So security there is not what you'd see at a Ft. Bragg, a Norfolk Naval Air Station or at Quantico,”  said Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren in a statement.

“So this is something we have to face. Security is not as extensive as it would be at a major installation. This is because we have to be in contact with the American public. We're continuing to look into this incident, working very closely with both federal and local law enforcement agencies to determine exactly what happened and if we need to make any adjustments."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to After Chattanooga shooting, Trump calls for Marines to carry guns
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0717/After-Chattanooga-shooting-Trump-calls-for-Marines-to-carry-guns
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe