Judge rules Chicago law to shore up imperiled pensions unconstitutional

The 2014 law had been enacted as part of an effort to reinforce pension plans for laborers and general municipal workers.

|
Sara Burnett/AP
Alice Johnson, executive director Illinois Nurses Association (c.) and Anders Lindall (r.), spokesman for AFSCME Council 31 speak at a news conference Friday in Chicago after Cook County Judge Rita Novak issued a written ruling stating that a 2014 law aimed at reducing multibillion-dollar shortfalls in two of Chicago's pension funds is unconstitutional. Mayor Rahm Emanuel has argued that without the changes the funds will be insolvent in a matter of years.

On Friday, Cook County Judge Rita Novak shot down a 2014 law aimed at reducing multi-billion-dollar deficits in two of Chicago's pension funds, ruling that the law is unconstitutional.

The move is widely considered a blow to Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel as he struggles to rescue his city’s credit rating and balance its finances.

“Chicago’s pension system is in increasingly precarious shape, and without changes, it is forecast to exhaust its assets in 10 to 13 years. The system is so large that its financial condition can affect the finances of the whole city. In May, Moody’s Investors Service lowered the city’s credit rating to junk status, saying that rising pension costs were ‘placing significant strain on the city’s financial operations,’ ” The New York Times reported Friday.

In 2014 the city of Chicago negotiated labor agreements to reinforce pension plans for laborers and general municipal workers. The agreements required a reduction of the cost-of-living increases that pensioners receive each year, and an increase of the mandatory contributions to pension funds that workers are obligated to give. The change would have affected around 61,000 city employees and retirees. Of the 31 unions whose members would be impacted by the changes, three sued.

Ultimately, Judge Novak agreed with the three unions that the ruling to change pensions was prohibited by a provision in the Illinois State Constitution that says public workers’ pensions cannot be “diminished or impaired.” Regardless, city officials insist that the pension funds will lose solvency if not overhauled, and warned that residents could see a huge tax increase as a result of the ruling.  

While Chicago has the worst-funded pension system of any major US city, the pension problem is not an anomaly in many US metropolises.

“The depth of Chicago’s current crisis is unusual, but the basic challenge is not. For years, local politicians in the US have been able to grant public-sector workers and labor unions retirement benefits that are generous by private-sector standards,” The Christian Science Monitor reported in April.

“Although there’s debate about whether public-sector workers can be generally called “overpaid,” the problem is this: The benefits haven’t been paid for in a sustainable way.”

Officials in the mayor’s office said that the city will appeal the ruling.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge rules Chicago law to shore up imperiled pensions unconstitutional
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0724/Judge-rules-Chicago-law-to-shore-up-imperiled-pensions-unconstitutional
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe