As the economy accelerates, the construction industry falters

While domestic manufacturing is growing, second-quarter GDP estimates may be reduced as construction sees its steepest decline in five years.

|
Lucy Nicholson
A construction crew works on a residential building in Los Angeles last month. Construction spending, which makes up roughly 12 percent of the US economy, has slowed in both the public and private sectors.

U.S. manufacturing activity expanded for a third straight month in May, but growth in new orders continued to slow as factories grappled with sluggish overseas demand and weak capital spending in the energy sector.

Other data on Wednesday showed construction spending recorded its biggest decline in more than five years in April as spending fell broadly, which could prompt economists to lower their second-quarter growth estimates.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said its index of national factory activity increased half a percentage point to a reading of 51.3 last month. The increase in the index largely reflected a jump in prices paid by factories for raw materials.

A reading above 50 indicates expansion in manufacturing, which accounts for about 12 percent of the U.S. economy.
Despite signs that the economy is regaining speed in the second quarter, manufacturing remains constrained by the lingering effects of the dollar's surge and oil price plunge between June 2014 and December 2015.

With the dollar's rally fading and oil prices steadily rising, there is cautious optimism that manufacturing will eventually find its footing.

Although the ISM index has remained above expansion territory for three consecutive months, so-called hard data on manufacturing has been generally weak.

The government reported last week that orders for long-lasting manufactured capital goods, excluding defense and aircraft, fell in April for a third straight month.

A separate report from the Commerce Department showed construction spending tumbled 1.8 percent after an upwardly revised 1.5 percent jump in March. April's drop was the largest since January 2011.

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast construction spending rising 0.6 percent in April after a previously reported 0.3 percent increase in March.

Construction outlays were up 4.5 percent from a year ago.

The weak construction report bucked fairly strong April data on consumer spending, industrial production, goods exports and housing, which have bolstered views the economy was regaining speed after growth braked to a 0.8 percent annualized rate in the first quarter.

As a result of the soft report, second-quarter gross domestic product estimates, currently ranging as high as a 2.9 percent rate, could be cut. However, the sharp upward revision to March's construction spending suggests the first-quarter GDP growth estimate could be revised higher.

In April, construction spending was held down by a 1.5 percent drop in private construction, which was the largest decline since January 2013. Outlays on private residential construction also fell 1.5 percent as spending on multifamily buildings tumbled 3.1 percent.

Spending on private nonresidential structures plunged 1.5 percent in April. Weak spending on nonresidential structures such as gas and oil well drilling contributed to slow economic growth at the start of the year.

Public construction spending dropped 2.8 percent in April as outlays on state and local government construction projects, the largest portion of the public sector segment, tumbled 3.0 percent. Federal government construction spending slipped 0.2 percent.

(Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Andrea Ricci)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to As the economy accelerates, the construction industry falters
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0601/As-the-economy-accelerates-the-construction-industry-falters
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe