Will recusal of Baton Rouge DA lead to fairer investigation in Sterling case?

East Baton Rouge District Attorney Hillar Moore announced he would recuse himself from investigations into conduct of the officers who shot Alton Sterling. Both the parents of one officer are also police – and they have interacted extensively with Moore.  

|
Shannon Stapleton/Reuters
Veda Washington, aunt of police shooting victim Alton Sterling, walks past the site of Sterling's death, the Triple S convenience store in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 11, 2016.

Following the shooting death of Alton Sterling at the hands of two Baton Rouge police officers, East Baton Rouge District Attorney Hillar Moore has recused himself from overseeing the investigation. Mr. Moore said he has a close working relationship with the parents of one of the officers, who are both officers themselves. 

The recusal sheds light on how extensive the contact between prosecutors and local police often is, and how these connections – necessary to the function of local justice – can make unbiased investigations into officer conduct more difficult.  

As DA, Moore has worked closely with both parents of Officer Blaine Salamoni, according to a report from his office. Mr. Salamoni's mother has worked on more than 400 homicide investigations with Moore since 2009 as the Violent Crime and Crime Scene Commander. Salamoni's father leads the police department's special operations unit, and he has provided and overseen 24-hour security for the DA, his family, and his staff.  

Moore has no direct connection to either officer, and, if only direct connections were considered, he could likely continue his role as the lead prosecutor, according to the report. But his connection to Salamoni's parents has lead to the recusal, although he stressed this decision would not serve as precedent for future investigations into officer violations of criminal laws. 

The close ties between local law enforcement and local prosecutors leads to structural challenges in investigating police shootings, Caren Myers Morrison, a former federal prosecutor who is a law professor at Georgia State University, told the Atlanta Journal Constitution. 

"If you anger the police they can make life very difficult for you," Ms. Morrison said. "There’s a lot that local prosecutors need from the police and vice-versa. So having a broken-down relationship between the police department and the prosecutor’s office would lead to the office coming to a standstill possibly."

The shooting deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner in 2014 and the subsequent non-indictments contributed to a decline in the public's trust in the judicial system to fairly investigate officer-involved shootings, as current San Jose, Calif., independent police auditor Walter Katz wrote for the Harvard Law Review. 

A 2014 YouGov poll found that only 37 percent of Americans, and a mere 19 percent of black Americans, trusted the justice system to "properly investigate situations where a police officer kills someone." 

Local prosecutors often show bias toward officers, Katz writes. Prosecutors depend on the police to help provide evidence to help them get future convictions. They are also hesitant to prosecute officers who break the law, as doing so lowers the credibility of the police, potentially hurting future cases.  

The lack of prosecution against officers fuels the public perception that the local judicial system favors officers, which can be traced to the community's belief in "a cycle of impunity, by which the reluctance of local government to prosecute bad cops empowers future misconduct and drives communities to regard the police as adversaries instead of protectors," Professor John Jacobi wrote for the Wisconsin Law Review in 2000. 

Katz proposes that state legislatures move the responsibility of investigating police-involved shootings to independent reviewers to prevent the prosecutorial bias. These independent investigations have been implemented in a handful of countries, including the UK, Britain, and Norway, he wrote. 

Moore's decision to recuse himself will re-direct the investigation into Sterling's case to the state's attorney general, who will appoint either a member of his staff of another DA to lead the investigation. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will recusal of Baton Rouge DA lead to fairer investigation in Sterling case?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0712/Will-recusal-of-Baton-Rouge-DA-lead-to-fairer-investigation-in-Sterling-case
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe