Thirty ideas from people under 30: The Change Agents

They are explorers and activists, artists and educators, farmers and faith leaders – even mayors. And they have trenchant suggestions on how to improve the world.

Jared Cohen: Moderator of extremism

Courtesy of Google
Jared Cohen is head of Google ideas.

The key to heading off tomorrow's violent extremist may exist within partnerships among those that have left extremist groups, argues Jared Cohen, the director of Google Ideas.

"Everyone's always asking where the voices against violent extremism are," says Mr. Cohen, a former member of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff under both Secretaries Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Rodham Clinton. "What we're trying to prove is that there are a lot of them out there. They just haven't been organized; they haven't been empowered."

Under Cohen, Google Ideas convened several dozen former violent extremists – from onetime gang members and religious extremists to white supremacists and hypernationalists – in Dublin, Ireland, in mid-2011 with the intention of outlining extremism's causes and forming networks to combat extremist behavior.

"What we found is that there is a lot of similarity across these [extremist] groups, much to our surprise but also to the surprise of the [participants] themselves," Cohen said. "Just by bringing them together and having them engage with one another and realize this, the summit gave life to a lot of unlikely partnerships and partnerships that have lived on independently of us."

While former extremists are able advocates against extremism within their own groups, Cohen says exposing at-risk youths to former extremists from other cultures offers a novel way to fight ideological violence.

"What we're trying to do is remove the masks of religion and ideology that are cultivated by violent extremists and focus on the common denominators of who they are and where they come from," Cohen says. When that happens, extreme movements "become far less remarkable than the extremists want [them] to look, which is very damaging to their cause[s]."

David Grant, Washington

Next: Shehrbano Taseer: Pakistan's voice for justice

2 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.