After deliberation, Wine challenges Ugandan election in court

Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine’s party has debated the merits of initiating legal action, wrangling over whether it’s a waste of time, or if going to court might legitimize the election. Others said it was the best way to expose fraud and corruption.

|
Nicholas Bamulanzeki/AP
Opposition presidential challenger Bobi Wine speaks to the media outside his home in Magere, Uganda, Jan. 26, 2021. Following the Jan. 14 vote, Mr. Wine was placed under a de facto house arrest when security forces surrounded his home.

Ugandan presidential challenger Bobi Wine on Monday launched a court case seeking to overturn the re-election of President Yoweri Museveni, who has been in power for 35 years.

Mr. Wine, whose real name is Kyagulanyi Ssentamu, had suggested he did not want to legitimize Mr. Museveni’s victory in last month’s polls by seeking justice with a court that has been reluctant to rule against the president in past elections. The Supreme Court ruled three times that electoral irregularities were not substantial enough to affect the outcome.

Mr. Museveni won the Jan. 14 elections with 58% of the vote, while Mr. Wine had 35%, according to final results announced last week by the electoral commission after accounting for results from nearly all polling stations.

Mr. Wine has accused electoral authorities of declaring “cooked-up results,” alleging irregularities such as soldiers stuffing ballot boxes, casting ballots for people, and chasing voters away from polling stations across the East African country. He has urged his supporters to protest his loss through nonviolent means.

Despite the assertions of fraud, Mr. Wine’s National Unity Platform party was not always sure that going to court was the right move. Some members said it was “a total waste of time” while others argued that it was necessary “to expose Museveni and put the judiciary on trial,” said Joel Ssenyonyi, a spokesman for Mr. Wine.

It was not immediately clear when courtroom arguments will begin.

Anthony Wameli, a Ugandan attorney who is part of Mr. Wine’s legal team, said they had amassed “glaring evidence” of malfeasance and would “dissect the voter register” in trying to prove that Mr. Museveni’s victory is invalid. But he cited challenges such as harassment by state agents he accused of detaining over 1,000 of Mr. Wine’s supporters before and after the elections.

“We are doing everything in hiding,” he said. “We are going to seek witness protection.”

In a Facebook post on Monday, Mr. Wine highlighted the case of a missing man he said was among many victims of alleged abductions.

“Countless Ugandans have been abducted and taken to unknown places,” he said. “Those who are lucky to return speak of horrifying stories of torture.”

Ladislaus Rwakafuuzi, an independent analyst who is a prominent rights attorney in Uganda, said he believes Mr. Wine will find it hard to convince the panel of judges to annul Mr. Museveni’s victory even if there is strong evidence.

“The only problem is the judges,” he said. “The judges want stability. They know that if they annul an election it can cause a coup or it can cause instability. That’s what they fear.”

Mr. Museveni has dismissed allegations of voter fraud.

Uganda’s elections were marred by violence ahead of polling day as well as an internet shutdown that remained in force until four days after the vote. Social media sites remain restricted.

Police surrounded Mr. Wine’s home for days after the elections, with authorities citing an urgent need to prevent him from leading protests. They withdrew from Mr. Wine’s residence last week after a judge ruled that Mr. Wine’s home is not a detention facility.

The United States and the European Union have noted concerns about Uganda’s elections. Natalie E. Brown, the U.S. ambassador, in a statement last week cited “deep and continuing concern about the extrajudicial detention of opposition political party members, the reported disappearance of several opposition supporters, and continued restrictions on the [National Unity Platform’s] operations.”

A popular singer before he won a seat in Uganda’s parliament, Mr. Wine has emerged as the country’s most powerful opposition figure. Mr. Wine has captured the imagination of many at home and abroad in his generational clash with Mr. Museveni. He has repeatedly called for the retirement of Mr. Museveni, a U.S. ally on regional security who accuses Mr. Wine of being a foreign agent. Mr. Wine denies the allegation.

Mr. Museveni was able to run again after lawmakers removed the last constitutional barrier – an age limit – to what some see as a possible life presidency for the leader.

Uganda has never witnessed a peaceful transfer of power since independence from Britain in 1962 – one reason why even some within Mr. Museveni’s party urge him to preside over an orderly transition.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to After deliberation, Wine challenges Ugandan election in court
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2021/0201/After-deliberation-Wine-challenges-Ugandan-election-in-court
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe