Earthquake aftermath: Chile learns from 2010 quake missteps

Minutes after Tuesday's quake, a tsunami alarm sounded and a large-scale evacuation order was given. These moves came in stark contrast to the 2010 disaster which killed hundreds.

|
Francisco Alcayaga Motta/Reuters
Fishermen try to salvage their boats in the aftermath of an earthquake and tsunami that hit the northern port of Iquique, Chile, on April 2.

The large earthquake that struck Chile Tuesday night didn't just trigger an emergency response and tsunami warning within minutes. It also called up memories of the failed 2010 response to another massive earthquake that triggered a devastating tsunami in southern Chile.

Since then, the southern cone country, which experiences frequent seismic activity, seems to have made important strides in improving how its government, non-profit organizations, and citizens respond. Yesterday's 8.2 magnitude earthquake, with an epicenter located some 59 miles offshore from the northern coastal city of Iquique, caused mostly localized damage. It was, in part, a sign of Chile's progress in natural-disaster preparedness, observers say.

“[Chile's response] showed that institutions function and that they can learn from their errors,” says Patricio Navia, a columnist and professor at New York University.

Last night's quake came just weeks after President Michelle Bachelet was sworn into office for her second, nonconsecutive term. The timing wasn't lost on Chileans: The 2010 temblor hit just days before President Bachelet closed out her 2006-10 term. At the time, her emergency preparedness office made the mistake of not sharing a tsunami alert given by another agency following the 8.8 magnitude temblor; most of the estimated 500 dead lost their lives to the resulting tsunami. 

But minutes after Tuesday's earthquake, a tsunami alarm in Iquique was sounded, government officials said. And shortly afterwards a large scale evacuation order was issued for all of Chile's coastal areas, affecting over 900,000 people. 

Over the course of the night in Iquique, waves topping six-feet-high crashed into the city causing minor flooding. A fleet of boats in a nearby fishing pier was severely damaged. Some roads were blocked by landslides, and electricity and water was cut in both Iquique and Arica, a city nearly 200 miles further to the north. So far six people have been confirmed dead.

Emergency officials provided half-hour updates with damage assessments, and activated an internal emergency response system among government officials from small-town mayors to ministers.

Addressing the news media, Bachelet said the emergency response system had worked. “First off, there was information, provided quickly and opportunely, in order to make the right decisions,” she told a mid-day news conference in the affected areas.

Past mistakes

The 2010 response was roundly criticized. And this week the former head of the office of emergency management was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in connection to the government's failure to pass on the tsunami alert to those in the wave's path. 

In addition to the errors in communicating the tsunami threat, observers say the system of how to respond to the ensuing disaster was non-existent then.

“In 2010, nobody knew who was in command,” says Mr. Navia. “And there was no control.”

In a country that suffered a military takeover in 1973, Bachelet, a member of the Socialist Party, was reluctant to call upon the military to control a large city to avoid looting, Navia said.

Since then, Chile has implemented a number of policies, from the placement of signs indicating tsunami escape routes in coastal cities, to greater coordination of emergency response among state agencies and with aid organizations, and rapid communication by authorities via smart phone alerts, to avert a repeat performance. 

This week, Bachelet didn’t hesitate to sign an order allowing the military to take control over the emergency response in the worst affected areas.

“In general, the population is significantly better prepared,” too, says Paola Avello, the national head of emergency response and humanitarian aid for World Vision, a US-based aid group, pointing to the rapid evacuation of citizens in coastal areas. She also credits the local expertise in emergencies that has been developed in the last four years. 

In the months leading up to last night's quake, for example, Iquique had participated in practice evacuation drills, Navia says.

But despite the relatively low number of fatalities after Tuesday's quake, Ms. Avello says that education on individual disaster preparedness needs more work. 

“Once people evacuate they don’t know what to do,” Avello says. “There is still a lot to learn.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Earthquake aftermath: Chile learns from 2010 quake missteps
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2014/0402/Earthquake-aftermath-Chile-learns-from-2010-quake-missteps
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe