Democratic progress: East Timor election proves peaceful

The first-round vote of East Timor's presidential election went smoothly, defying low expectations based on the tiny country's violent history.

|
Kandhi Barnez/AP
East Timor presidential front-runner Francisco "Lu Olo" Guterres speaks during a press conference in Dili, East Timor, March 19. Guterres, of the traditionally strong leftist Fretilin party, is currently leading in the vote counting of this month's election.

Dark clouds hung over this young nation the day before a much-anticipated presidential election on March 17. With jittery analysts playing up the potential for conflict, they appeared a powerful portent of the way polls could play out in a tiny country known for its far larger history of violence.

But more than a week after the polls closed peacefully, and ballot counting wrapped up with little contestation, East Timor appears to have cleared the first hurdle toward standing on its own.

The country, which is grindingly poor, has been under the watchful eyes of a United Nations’ stabilization mission since factional fighting between police and security forces broke out in 2006, prior to the last election, killing 37 people and driving more than 100,000 from their homes.

That conflict came just four years after UN forces left for the first time, having governed the country in the rocky years after a bloody vote for separation from Indonesia in 1999.

Now, two men remain in the contest for president, which will go to a second round in mid-April. In the lead is Francisco “Lu Olo” Guterres, head of the hardcore leftist Fretilin Party, followed closely by Jose Maria Vasconcelos, a former armed forces commander popularly known as Taur Matan Ruak (Two Sharp Eyes) for his time spent devising military strategy against a brutal 24-year Indonesian occupation.

Both are decidedly different from incumbent, Jose Ramos-Horta, who was knocked out in the first round. The Nobel laureate who led the resistance against Indonesia from overseas spent much of his presidency advocating for the country on the international stage. Some political observers say Mr. Ramos-Horta’s lackluster campaign, which paled against the flashy posters and flag-waving parades of his competitors, hurt his re-election chances. So did an apparent rift with Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao, whose endorsement went to Mr. Ruak.

Others say poor support for Ramos-Horta owes largely to discontent with the country’s development during his five-year term.

After years of increasing alienation from the government under a president many respected but saw as out of touch with East Timor’s reality, people want a new man “driving” the country, says Nelson Belo, the director of Fundasaun Mahein, a local organization focused on defense and security issues.

Though the post of president is largely ceremonial, whoever wins will play a key role in forming the government after parliamentary elections in June. If those go well, the UN peacekeepers and a force of 460 Australian and New Zealand troops will pack up and go home – for good, they say.

“It’s really important to the Timorese that they say goodbye,” says Edward Rees, a long-time Timor observer. “People haven’t gotten value for the money spent in the past five years.”

In some ways they have. The country is now less violent and dysfunctional than it was, but long-standing divisions remain unresolved and many of the long-term reforms needed to improve the rule of law and ensure balanced development have stalled.

“We are experiencing growth without employment, relying on petroleum and importing everything,” says Fidelis Magalhaes, the sharp, young leader of Ruak’s campaign, referring to a billion-dollar petroleum fund that supports 90 percent of the country’s ballooning budget.

Both sides say the country needs a president with a vision. Foreign advisers say it needs to take responsibility for its economic and political development. What seems to matter to voters, however, is visible change, and when they go to the polls again in April, they’ll likely be voting for a president who they hope can deliver.

* Editor's note: A quotation was removed from the story because it violated the terms of the interview.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Democratic progress: East Timor election proves peaceful
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0326/Democratic-progress-East-Timor-election-proves-peaceful
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe