Pro-democracy advocates in Hong Kong press on as Beijing seeks to make example of them in court

For decades, Hong Kong’s activists have been fighting for democracy. The Hong Kong court on May 30 convicted 14 pro-democracy activists in the city’s biggest national security case under a law imposed by Beijing that has all but wiped out public dissent.

|
Louise Delmotte
Emilia Wong writes a letter to partner Ventus Lau after visiting him in a Hong Kong prison, March 25, 2024. Mr. Lau joines 47 pro-democracy activists charged with conspiracy to subvert the government.

Activist Chan Po-ying is permitted only 15-minute daily visits to see her husband, Leung Kwok-hung, separated by a plexiglass barrier in a highly guarded Hong Kong jail.

Mr. Leung is one of 47 activists who were prosecuted in the largest national security law case to date in the former British colony. Most of them have been separated from their loved ones for years, uncertain when they might reunite. 

The government had warned there might be legal consequences, but Ms. Chan didn’t stop former pro-democracy legislator Mr. Leung from participating in an unofficial 2020 primary election that would lead to his prosecution under a national security law that Beijing imposed on the semi-autonomous city.

“Maybe we were too naive,” Ms. Chan said with a laugh.

Charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, Mr. Leung and other defendants are accused of attempting to paralyze Hong Kong’s government and topple the city’s leader by securing the legislative majority necessary to veto budgets. The charge carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Those who pleaded guilty have a better chance at shorter prison terms and will be sentenced at a later date.

“I guess almost none can be acquitted,” said Ms. Chan, who chairs the League of Social Democrats, one of the city’s few remaining pro-democracy parties. “I am not optimistic. But I also hope someone can get away from it.”

On May 30, 14 activists who pleaded not guilty – including Mr. Leung – were convicted. Two defendants were acquitted, but the prosecution said it intends to appeal against the acquittals.

Activism in Hong Kong

Ms. Chan was part of a wave of youth activism spreading through Hong Kong when she met Mr. Leung in a Marxist group around 1975, when the city was still under British rule.

At first, Ms. Chan viewed Mr. Leung as a “troublesome guy,” being adamant about winning every debate. Despite this, they fell in love, and their bond transcended mere romance, Ms. Chan said; they are “comrades-in-arms.”

A 2005 protest solidified their bond. The two were some of the only Hong Kongers who stayed steadfast with the overseas demonstrators, even after police deployed tear gas and threatened arrest.

“Among those who stood with us in our youth, only the two of us stayed at the site,” she said.

Activism in Hong Kong reached a peak in 2014 with the so-called Umbrella Movement, in which demonstrators used umbrellas to fend off police pepper spray in a nearly 80-day face-off. When Beijing didn’t budge, some young activists began advocating for Hong Kong’s independence.

Suppression was swift. Several pro-independence activists were blocked from joining elections, and in 2018, Hong Kong authorities banned a small pro-independence party.

Ventus Lau was among those caught in the crackdown. He was barred from running in an election in 2018, even though he renounced his pro-independence stance. But that didn’t deter him from becoming more politically active, helping organize protests in 2019 that saw generations of Hong Kongers rallying against a now-withdrawn bill that would have allowed people in the city to be extradited to mainland China.

The largest protest drew an estimated 2 million people – more than a quarter of the city’s population.

Mr. Lau is one of the defendants who decided to plead guilty in the subversion case related to the 2020 primary. Emilia Wong, a feminist influencer and longtime girlfriend of Mr. Lau, supported his activism.

In those years after the Umbrella Movement was stifled, Ms. Wong remembered feeling hopeful for a more democratic Hong Kong, despite the somber mood in the city.

“2019 represented a peak of such hopes,” she said. But the high hopes were short-lived.

The primary vote and the clampdown

As protests waned due to mass arrests and COVID-19 restrictions, Beijing intensified its control. On June 30, 2020, the sweeping national security law was imposed. Both the Chinese and Hong Kong governments deemed it necessary to restore the city’s stability. Several political groups dissolved on the same day.

Just a week later, a city official warned that the pro-democracy primaries might violate the security law. They held the vote anyway, resulting in an unexpectedly high turnout of 610,000.

The poll, organized within the pro-democracy camp, was meant to shortlist candidates who would then run in the official election for the legislature, typically dominated by the pro-Beijing camp. They hoped that, with a legislative majority, the government would listen to their demands.

But things didn’t go as planned.

After the primary, Beijing said the vote challenged the security law that critics argue has been broadly applied to anything the government claims could threaten stability.

When police officers arrived at Ms. Wong’s home in January 2021 to arrest Mr. Lau for participating in the election, she recalled, “It felt so absurd that I had to laugh.”

That month, over 50 former lawmakers and democracy proponents were arrested under the national security law. Authorities accused them of planning to get enough people into office to indiscriminately veto budgets, grinding governmental functions to a halt, and to force the city leader to step down.

Of those arrested, 47 were charged and brought to court for days of bail hearings, during which time some were hospitalized due to fatigue and others weren’t able to shower for days. Most of the defendants were denied bail.

Lives upended

After Mr. Lau was taken into custody, Ms. Wong devoted her time to arranging food and book deliveries for him, handling media interviews about the case, organizing visits from his friends, and assisting him with his application to restart university studies while detained.

Each day left Ms. Wong feeling utterly drained as she also grappled with the shock of Mr. Lau’s prosecution. One day, upon receiving clothes worn by Mr. Lau during his detention that still carried his scent, she burst into tears.

“It was a blow to me, specifically to my personal vision of Hong Kong,” she said.

Even for veteran activists like Ms. Chan, the situation was painful. To her, 2021 was suffocating. After Mr. Leung was denied bail, Ms. Chan would find herself crying without any particular reason during her commutes.

Months after the 47 activists were prosecuted, arrests of top management at Apple Daily and Stand News – prominent media outlets known for their critical reports on the government – forced them to shut down. Dozens of civil society groups disbanded. Some of Ms. Chan’s League of Social Democrats members were also jailed.

That year, Ms. Chan wondered daily what would happen next. “I felt lonely, but I had to handle so many things,” she said.

Life in detention

To maintain their relationship between the limited visits, Mr. Lau has been writing Ms. Wong a letter every day since 2021, sometimes penning Canto-pop song lyrics to express his love. In return, Ms. Wong dedicated a love song to Mr. Lau on the radio for his birthday.

To Ms. Wong, staying with Mr. Lau is a natural choice. Mr. Lau signed an agreement granting her control over his affairs – a document she described as more powerful than a marriage certificate. She said she would do her best to support him.

Even behind bars, Ms. Wong said, Mr. Lau drives her to become a better person – when he picked up his reading pace, Ms. Wong followed suit. In turn, Ms. Wong offered critiques of Mr. Lau’s lyrics. Mr. Lau pursued his translation degree and Ms. Wong became a regular at the gym.

“I’m not just standing still waiting; I’ve been running all along, and so has he,” she said.

Ms. Chan said life in detention has left Mr. Leung visibly thinner and downhearted. Despite their fiery temperaments, Mr. Leung sometimes avoids arguments during their brief visits.

“He cherishes our 15 minutes together,” Ms. Chan said. “But I also feel very upset because this isn’t the real him.”

In the most optimistic scenario, it might take three to four more years to see Mr. Leung free again, Ms. Chan said. In the meantime, she continues to organize small-scale street demonstrations, despite the threat of the new national security law that critics fear will further constrict civil liberties.

Ms. Chan knows her actions might not make a significant impact, but she says persistence in their respective roles is still meaningful.

“It’s not like nothing has been achieved,” she said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Pro-democracy advocates in Hong Kong press on as Beijing seeks to make example of them in court
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2024/0530/Hong-Kong-protests-Beijing-arrests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe