AI makes the fashion industry faster and greener. But what will that mean for workers?

Suppliers and brands across the $1.7 trillion global fashion industry are starting to use AI technology to boost production and reduce their climate impact. But recent innovations could threaten some of the 75 million jobs in the labor-intensive industry. 

|
Mahmud Hossain Opu/AP/File
Garment employees work at Arrival Fashion Limited in Gazipur, Bangladesh, March 13, 2021. Factory fashion jobs could be under threat due to recent AI innovations.

In the industrial town of Rupganj outside of Bangladesh’s capital, clothing manufacturer Fakir Fashions is using artificial intelligence to automatically pause production and avoid waste when something goes wrong in its knitting operations.

AI technology has also allowed the fashion supplier, which employs about 10,000 workers, to dismiss dozens of human quality inspectors, said managing director Fakir Kamruzzaman Nahid.

Suppliers and brands across the $1.7 trillion global fashion industry are beginning to use AI technology, such as in cameras and sensors that detect defects, to boost production, and to reduce their environmental impact, including by monitoring emissions and water use.

The sector is responsible for between 2% to 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. It is also one of the world’s major polluters of water sources and produces vast amounts of waste that wind up in landfills.

While AI could help improve the apparel business’ environmental track record, it also poses a threat to some of the 75 million jobs in the labor-intensive industry worldwide, already under pressure from other forms of automation.

“We know what is coming on fashion’s AI front – and if workers do not get to have a say about how it impacts them, they are at a disadvantage as a class,” said Christina Hajagos-Clausen, textile and garment industry director at IndustriALL Global Union, a Geneva-based global federation of unions.

Greener fashion

Most global fashion brands are looking at how generative AI can improve their businesses, with 73% of executives saying in a survey by consulting firm McKinsey that they consider AI a priority in the coming years.

While there is no comprehensive research into AI’s potential to reduce the industry’s emissions, a few studies offer clues at how it might help. For example, using digital samples of clothes before going into production could cut carbon dioxide emissions by 30% in the design and development of clothes.

Sweden’s H&M Group, the world’s second-largest clothing retailer, has said it is investing in AI tools to recycle post-consumer waste and reduce deforestation by fashion manufacturers.

Smartex, a company based in Portugal that is developing AI for the textile industry, has sold its technology to help save energy and water to factories in about 10 countries, said Max Easton, director of global innovation.

Saving labor

AI-powered automation is expected to revolutionize the way humans work across almost all industries.

As many as 74% of business executives from different industries expect some manual jobs to be replaced by AI, according to a recent survey by the British Standards Institution.

In Bangladesh, the world’s second-biggest garment exporter, about 60% of apparel workers, or 2.7 million people, risk losing their jobs due to automation including AI, according to the International Labour Organization.

But some experts believe that the textile industry will still need human labor, especially for complex, high-skilled work.

“The influence of AI on jobs is a million-dollar question that we are all pondering, and my wager is that AI in fashion will complement rather than replace humans,” said Shahriar Akter, professor of analytics and innovation at Australia’s University of Wollongong.

While Fakir Fashions reduced its quality control workforce after bringing in AI, Mr. Nahid said the money it saved on those wages and on the hundreds of kgs of waste the tools prevented will enable it to expand operations – and add new jobs.

“To stay competitive, we need to cut costs and adopt new innovations. But better tools also will bring us business and make up for the job losses,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The pace of AI adoption, and automation in general, varies across the textile industry.

In Bangladesh, companies still largely rely on manual labor to sew and stitch clothes, but fully automated machines that knit sweaters have already drastically cut jobs.

Yousuf Jamil, who works at a sweater factory in the town of Gazipur, said he oversees six machines and accomplishes what a dozen people could do manually. But he receives the same pay as a worker weaving a T-shirt.

“The fashion industry needs a plan for reskilling workers, either for keeping their jobs within the industry or transitioning to other jobs in the coming years,” said Amirul Amin, president of the National Garment Workers Federation (NGWF) of Bangladesh.

The U.S.-based startup Shimmy Technologies works with brands and nonprofit organizations, including H&M and the development organization Asia Foundation, to provide workers with game-based training apps that teach them how to operate new machines at factories in Bangladesh and Central America.

“In this world of AI, there will be a need for constant upskilling, and you cannot meet that need at scale by providing classroom-based training alone,” said Sarah Krasley, who founded Shimmy Technologies in 2016.

While low-skilled jobs are most at risk, the growing use of AI in the textile industry will create demand for better-paid engineers and technicians, said AI engineer Zahid Hasan, who works with local fashion suppliers in Bangladesh.

As apparel workers in Bangladesh and elsewhere brace for the impact of AI on their livelihoods, Mr. Akter of the University of Wollongong said now is the time to prepare for the coming disruption.

“We are still on the cusp of the AI revolution in the fashion industry, and we need strategies to harness the power of AI to benefit workers and the environment,” said Mr. Akter.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to AI makes the fashion industry faster and greener. But what will that mean for workers?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2024/1105/AI-fast-fashion-workers-garment-industry-climate
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe