Skip to footer

Costa Concordia: Top 4 'deceptions' by ship's captain

From the moment that Capt. Francesco Schettino made his fateful decision to steer the Costa Concordia cruise ship close to shore, to his description of whether he stayed with the ship to help evacuate its 4,000 passengers, there has been a pattern of untruths and attempted coverup. Here are four examples, running the gamut from 'technical' to incredulous.

'No. No way have I abandoned ship. I'm here' – Schettino

Alessandro La Rocca/Lapresse/AP
Francesco Schettino, the captain of the Costa Concordia cruise ship.

  • By Robert Marquand Staff Writer

Schettino said on Italian TV that “we were the last to leave the ship.” Yet witnesses describe Schettino wrapped in a blanket on the shore at 11:40 p.m., two hours after the crash, one hour after first alerting authorities, and a full six hours before evacuation was complete.

In the instantly famous recording between Schettino and coast guard official Mr. De Falco, the latter tells the captain at 1:46 a.m., “Listen, Schettino. There are people trapped on board. Now, you go with your lifeboat. […] Go on board the ship and get back to me and tell me how many people are there.[…] Listen Schettino, perhaps you have saved yourself from the sea but I will make you look very bad. I will make you pay for this."

Schettino insists it is “too dark to see,” and he is “coordinating” the rescue from his lifeboat. While he agreed to go back on board, Italian officials believe he did not.

Before a magistrate Tuesday, Schettino reportedly said he accidentally fell into a life boat: “The passengers were pouring onto the decks, taking the lifeboats by assault. I didn’t even have a life jacket because I had given it to one of the passengers,” he is quoted as saying. “I was trying to get people to get into the boats in an orderly fashion. Suddenly, since the ship was at a 60 to 70 degree angle, I tripped, and I ended up in one of the boats. That’s how I found myself there.” He reportedly remained in the lifeboat for nearly an hour before it was launched.

4 of 4
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.