Who is Spain's Judge Baltasar Garzón? Five key questions answered.

Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzón was found guilty today on charges of illegal wiretapping and abuse of power. Garzón is known as a “super judge” because of the high profile human rights cases he has overseen internationally. 

3. What are the charges against Garzón regarding his Franco investigation?

The charges related to Garzón’s investigation into human rights abuses under former Spanish dictator Gen. Francisco Franco are probably the most talked about of the three concurrent charges.  
 
General Franco ruled Spain under a fascist regime for nearly 40 years, and during that time hundreds of thousands of people were killed, forced into exile, or sent to concentration camps. Two years after his death and the end of his regime, the Spanish parliament passed an amnesty law making it “illegal to revisit political crimes from that era,” reports NPR. 

However, in 2008, Garzón ordered mass graves exhumed, and named Franco as one of 34 suspects in the deaths of 114,000 opponents of the Franco regime, reports the Guardian. He is charged with abusing his power as a judge after ordering a formal court investigation into Franco-era crimes in disregard of the amnesty law.

Garzón testified that he decided to investigate because he believes the crimes of Franco’s rule are “permanent crimes” that continue to affect the descendants of victims today, reports CNN.

He said he began to see evidence that there was a "systematic plan" against Franco's opponents, which he said included forced disappearances, illegal detentions and assassinations.

The charges were brought against him by a reportedly conservative civil servants union called Clean Hands.

In 2007, the Socialist Party passed a “historical memory” law recognizing the victims of Spain’s civil war, but digging into the events remains largely taboo.

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.