Two earthquakes in two weeks test Italians' morale

Workers had just returned to a biomedical factory in Medolla when the second quake hit, causing their building to collapse. Some unions have criticized what they say is a lack of safety concern.

|
Giorgio Benvenuti/Reuters
Rescue workers search through the debris of a factory which was damaged after an earthquake in Medolla near Modena May 29. An earthquake struck northern Italy on Tuesday, killing at least 10 people, damaging buildings and spreading panic among thousands of residents still living in tents after a tremor shook the region just over a week ago, destroying their homes.

In Medolla, a small town of 6,000 in central Italy, some workers were afraid to go back to work after an earthquake shook the area last week.

When a second earthquake shook the same region yesterday, a biomedical factory in Medolla collapsed, leaving four dead and one missing. The factory had just reopened its doors after the first temblor.

“The psychological impact of having two earthquakes in a row is a tough one,” says Tommaso Della Longa, a spokesperson for the Italian Red Cross. “Now it's going to be very difficult for us to convince people to go back to their houses.”

The two earthquakes, which claimed at least 24 lives (seven from the first, 17 from the second), hit Emilia Romagna, a wealthy region in the plain known for its food exports and industrial production. This meant that rescue operations could be carried out smoothly, says Mr. Della Longa, especially when compared with the quake that devastated Abruzzo, a much poorer region in the Appennini mountains. 

“Emilia Romagna is so well equipped, that after the first earthquake the local authorities could manage the first emergency situation by themselves, without help from the outside,” he says. “But after this new tremor, they need help.”

Many of the buildings that have been severely damaged are factories, raising concerns about the impact on the economy of the region, which is one of the most productive in Italy, and about construction standards.

Yesterday, a prominent union leader criticized business owners for what she viewed as a lack of safety concerns. “They shouldn't have allowed people back to work so early, and I wonder whether factories had the appropriate security standards,” said Susanna Camusso, head of CGIL, Italy's major labor union. The local police have opened an inquiry on the collapse of Haemotronic.

Even before the two earthquakes, some had raised concerns about the state of Italy's infrastructure: According to a study published earlier in May, 6 million buildings in Italy are facing “grave seismic risks,” most of them quickly built after World War II.

Mr. Della Longa says that basic humanitarian needs, such as clean water and shelter, for those who have lost their homes are already covered, and he believes the main challenges are the economy and morale.

“First of all we have to make sure the earth has indeed stopped shaking, which we cannot control," Della Longa says. "Then we must verify that factories and houses are safe and help people overcome their fear and go back to their lives.”

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Two earthquakes in two weeks test Italians' morale
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0530/Two-earthquakes-in-two-weeks-test-Italians-morale
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe