Estonia hits NATO target on defense spending, but lags on gender equality

Estonians look to the Nordic nations as role models. But when it comes to paying women equally, it lags far behind its Scandinavian cousins.

|
Ints Kalnins
Estonia's Prime Minister Taavi Roivas listens to his Latvian counterpart Laimdota Straujuma as she speaks during a visit to an underground gas storage facility in Incukalns April 25, 2014.

For some 300 years, Estonia's history has been closely tied to its giant neighbor to the east, Russia. But when it comes to identity, many Estonians see themselves as Nordic. 

That sounds like a stretch. In fact, Estonians are very closely related in language and ethnicity to the Finns, just 50 miles north, and have shared history with Sweden. Both are among the richest and most egalitarian societies in Europe, making Estonia's an aspirational goal. 

Yet despite their dreams of Nordic egalitarianism, Estonia comes in last in European Union (EU) gender pay parity, behind even fellow post-Soviet states Latvia and Lithuania with no such aspirations. According to government data, Estonian men earn one quarter more than their female counterparts, and the gap is widening.

The most prosaic explanation for the disparity is career paths: Estonia’s well-paying IT sector, which spawned Skype, is dominated by men.

“One of the sectors with the highest pay rates in Estonia is IT, with program developers in the lead,” says Terje Toomistu, a doctoral researcher who studies gender issues at the University of Tartu. “Women are more likely to work in the area of care – social workers, educators, caretakers – with...smaller salaries.”

Careers are one reason. Another is Estonia's failure to build a strong welfare state, a staple of the Nordic model. Budget priorities mean that single mothers receive as little as $25 a month per child.

Yet while Estonia is miserly on social spending, it has hit NATO's target for spending 2 percent of GDP on defense, one of only three European NATO members to do so. 

As a small country on Europe’s frontier, Estonia has sought security in institutions like NATO and the European Union. The trade-off appears to be a failure to pay for the generous subsidies of the Nordic model, such as free childcare.  

Estonia’s new government, headed by Prime Minister Taavi Rõivas, has shown signs of a more flexible approach to social issues, including increases in pensions and child allowances, says Karsten Staehr, professor of international and public finance at Tallinn University of Technology. "Most of the new measures could be seen to move Estonia in the direction of its Nordic neighbors." 

The effect of traditional gender roles

However, such policies still run up against traditional attitudes towards gender relations, including among politicians like Mr. Rõivas. As former Minister of Social Affairs, he opposed the idea of a quota for women in corporate boardrooms. “A Europe-wide quota seems a completely inappropriate measure, which in Estonia’s context would definitely not yield the desired results," he told a public broadcaster last year. 

Mr. Staehr points out that the government's new spending commitments are modest and that income tax is also being cut at the same time. "The government budget will still be balanced and Estonia will retain its position as the EU country with the lowest debt-to-GDP ratio," he says. 

In Estonia, men are still widely expected to be the family breadwinners, says Ms. Toomitsu. “Women are assumed to be the hardworking ones, who can manage their double-job between work and home. No wonder we say in Estonia that poverty has the face of a single mother.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Estonia hits NATO target on defense spending, but lags on gender equality
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0904/Estonia-hits-NATO-target-on-defense-spending-but-lags-on-gender-equality
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe