Europe’s middle ground slides to the right under extremist influence

|
Markus Schreiber/AP
Björn Höcke, top candidate of the far-right Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, campaigns on Aug. 13 for state elections.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

The far-right Alternative for Germany party won a state election Sunday, and took second place in another, results unheard of since Nazi days.

The party will not join in governing; its rivals have agreed among themselves to freeze the anti-immigration group out. But in Germany, and across Europe, radical right-wingers – from authoritarian-minded populists to out-and-out Nazis – are wielding increasing influence on mainstream parties.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Far-right parties are ruling only a few European countries, but their ideas are gathering momentum in traditionally middle-of-the-road groups.

“They’ve moved in an immigration-restrictive direction, typical in many countries where the far right are not allowed into coalitions but have influence anyway,” says Katrine Fangen, a sociologist at the University of Oslo who specializes in far-right extremism.

The rightward shift visible in middle-of-the-road parties across the continent stems partly from pressure from the far right, and partly from a belief among mainstream conservatives that the best way to defeat the extremists is to borrow their ideas.

Centrist parties have themselves to blame, argues Jan Techau, a German political scientist and director for Europe at the Eurasia Group. The new radicalism has profited from their failure to address real problems, such as immigration and security, he says.

“And because there’s still little movement to tackle this issue … people [will] start to embrace the rhetoric and it becomes normal,” Mr. Techau warns.

For the surging far right in Germany, a Syrian asylum-seeker’s brutal knife attack that killed three and wounded eight others could not have been better timed.

It’s election season, and the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) jumped on the Aug. 23 incident, riding the party’s anti-immigration platform to victory on Sunday. The party won 33% of the vote in one east German state election – the first state win for the extreme right since World War II – and a second-place finish with about 30% in another.

The AfD is unlikely to be able to form a regional government; its more moderate rivals will boycott the extremist group when it comes to building ruling coalitions. But across Europe, radical right-wingers – from authoritarian-minded populists to out-and-out Nazis – are wielding increasing influence on mainstream parties.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Far-right parties are ruling only a few European countries, but their ideas are gathering momentum in traditionally middle-of-the-road groups.

It’s a new world in Europe. The head of Germany’s conservative Christian Democratic Union now dubs his country’s traditionally welcoming migration policy “naive.” French centrists are calling for more law and order, and Norwegian conservatives have discussed keeping refugees in camps abroad, rather than offering them shelter in Norway.

Once-extremist points of view are being normalized, says Cécile Alduy, a French professor and author who examines nationhood and identity. “The danger is that we are starting to have governments that don’t have the stigma of the label ‘far right’ but get people used to thinking that depriving people of rights because of their origins or skin color is ok,” she wrote in an email interview.

The mainstream drifts rightward

In France last week, a migrant from Cape Verde ran over and killed a gendarme. The man still held a license despite nearly a dozen traffic violations, a fact that sparked outrage.

France’s domestic affairs minister trumpeted the law-and-order language of the far right. “Policemen and gendarmes are being killed, and indeed the courts should be much firmer against those who use their vehicle … as a weapon,” said Gérald Darmanin.

Thomas Padilla/AP/File
Opponents of France’s immigration law protest with banners that read, “Freedom, equality, fraternity” and “No to the immigration law” at Trocadéro plaza in Paris.

Mr. Darmanin has promoted an immigration law taken in part from the far-right National Rally’s platform; the resulting policy was so extreme that France’s highest court judged it unconstitutional. In July, President Emmanuel Macron criticized what he called a “totally immigrationist” policy proposal from the opposition, using a radical-right buzzword from the 1990s.

This rightward shift away from the middle ground in France reflects “partly pressure from the far right, and partly belief among the conservatives that the best way to defeat the far right is to borrow from them,” says Jean-Yves Camus, a French political scientist and expert in nationalist movements.

German centrists – despite a decades-long mission to ensure a movement like Nazism never again takes root in society – have not been immune to this rightward momentum either.

After the Syrian man’s knife attack two weeks ago, German conservative leader Friedrich Merz declared a “turning point” and demanded an end to migration from Syria and Afghanistan, which would likely be illegal under European Union and German law.

Sweden, with a long history of liberal immigration policies and a huge welfare state, proudly agreed to take in more than 160,000 refugees in 2015. By 2021, the “Moderate Party” was forging a proposal with populists to tighten borders, reduce numbers of asylum-seekers, and restrict welfare benefits for immigrants, among other policies long championed by the far right.

“They’ve moved in an immigration-restrictive direction, typical in many countries where the far right are not allowed into coalitions but have influence anyway,” says Katrine Fangen, a sociologist at the University of Oslo who specializes in extremism.

If radicalism is creeping into the mainstream, the fact is that it profited from an opening that centrist parties themselves created by their decades-long failure to address real problems that people are now getting radicalized about, says Jan Techau, a German political scientist and director for Europe at the Eurasia Group.

Those issues include immigration and homeland security. “And because there’s still little movement to tackle this issue, the rhetoric will get harsher, and people start to embrace the rhetoric and it becomes normal,” says Mr. Techau.

The right sometimes gets it wrong

Political outcomes could unfold in a variety of ways.

In the Netherlands, the far right won the most parliamentary seats in last year’s election. But party leader Geert Wilders has been unable to form a government – in the face of concerted opposition – despite having given up his ambition to become prime minister and having ditched some of his most dramatic policies, such as banning mosques and leaving the EU.

Peter Dejong/AP
Hundreds of people joined a gathering to protest the Dutch election victory of Geert Wilders’ far-right Party for Freedom in November 2023.

In France, on the other hand, the prospect that Marine Le Pen might win presidential elections in 2027 is no longer outlandish. “It’s a reality,” says Dr. Camus, the French political scientist. “Ten years ago, it was totally beyond the pale. It was science fiction.”

Yet, in some countries, conservative parties that were radicalized by the immigration issue and rode into government over the last decade, have since suffered setbacks.

British Conservative party leaders had referred to illegal migration as an “invasion” and framed Brexit as a way to “take back control” of borders. The party was swept from office in July.

In Poland, during the 2015 migrant crisis that happened to coincide with national elections, conservative politicians accused migrants of carrying parasites and warned that Muslim migrants would undermine Poland’s Christian identity. That helped them win the election, but they were voted out of office in 2023.

Germany’s Nazi past might hold the far right at bay in special ways, say analysts. For one, mainstream parties have put a “firewall” around forming coalitions with the far right.

But when centrists feel pressure from the far right, and adopt the rhetoric, says Hajo Funke, a German political scientist at the Free University in Berlin, “it does restrict the liberal atmosphere. It’s polarizing, and reduces this atmosphere of acknowledging one another, of empathy towards the problems of others. It’s a big danger.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Europe’s middle ground slides to the right under extremist influence
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/0903/Europe-s-middle-ground-slides-to-the-right-under-extremist-influence
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe