Closer Iran-US relations? Why Ayatollah Khamenei says, 'No.'

Iranian Supreme Leader says Tehran will have no negotiations with the US over bilateral issues, but other Iranian officials do not dismiss the possibility.

|
Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivers his sermon during the Eid al-Fitr prayer at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque in Tehran, Iran, on July 18, 2015.

Over the past 13 years, Iran’s nuclear program has caused long-term quarrels among the international community and resulted in severe economic pressures on Iran. But it also eventually led to direct negotiations between decades-long arch-foes: Iran and the United States.

Iran and six world powers reached a historic nuclear deal on July 14 after talks that spanned 20 months. The deal was received by the negotiators with broad smiles and even tears of joy.

In the wake of that momentous pact, leaders of both countries hinted that the deal could lead the two nations toward a more cooperative relationship. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said the agreement begins “a new chapter.” He added that if carried out correctly, “we can gradually eliminate distrust.” And President Obama noted: “This deal offers an opportunity to move in a new direction. We should seize it.”

But on Saturday Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei vowed that Iran’s policy toward the US will not change. “We will have no negotiations with the US over bilateral, as well as regional and international issues. There are some exceptions like the nuclear program that has been previously going on as well,” Mr. Khamenei said.

Speaking at a Tehran mosque to mark the end of holy fasting month of Ramadan, Ayatollah Khamenei once again thanked the Iranian negotiating team for the nuclear talks, but added that Iran has not bowed to US pressure.

Over the past decades, the Islamic Republic has always said that bilateral relations with the US were Iran’s “red line" – a view of late that's mostly expressed by Iranian hardliners. Khamenei’s Saturday remarks are in line with that mindset. But amid such red-line rhetoric, there have been actions during the past two years that have blurred the “red line.”

The Sept. 27, 2013 phone conversation between Iranian President Rouhani and President Obama marked the start of direct talks, something that seemed impossible at one time.

And then came the nuclear talks, specifically the Nov. 24, 2013 interim nuclear deal. After the agreement was read, Iranian and American foreign ministers shook hands for the first time in front of cameras.

After 20 months of direct negotiations, some in the US and Iran suggest that the fence mending may continue – even amid the hardline rhetoric. Such positions reflect the divisions within Iran's body politic – and a similar divide among US politicians.

On July 8, former Iranian president, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, told the Guardian that the reopening of the US embassy in Tehran is “not possible,” but added that “that depends on the behavior of both sides.”

A close confidante of Khamenei, Rafsanjani also hailed Iran’s decision to negotiate directly with Washington. “We have broken a taboo,” he added.

Khamanei's statements Saturday, on the face of it, appear to be a rebuke to any further cooperation between the two nations. But the two nations have allied goals on several fronts – including battling the Islamic State – which may in fact led them to a more normal bilateral relationship. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Closer Iran-US relations? Why Ayatollah Khamenei says, 'No.'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0718/Closer-Iran-US-relations-Why-Ayatollah-Khamenei-says-No
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe