NATO's in charge – so who is doing what in Libya?

France, Britain

Michel Euler/AP
French President Nicolas Sarkozy speaks during a media conference at an EU summit in Brussels on Friday, March 25.

France was the first country to recognize Libya’s opposition as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people. President Nicolas Sarkozy was the earliest, most vocal proponent of international intervention among world leaders. He led the way in gathering international backing for the proposal and his country was also the first with planes in the air following the passage of UN Resolution 1973.

Mr. Sarkozy opposed the idea of NATO taking over command of the Libya operations, preferring a coalition led by the UK and France (the US made it clear it did not want to remain in command).

He has since gotten on board with the NATO takeover. France has continued carrying out airstrikes and will still participate in operations in Libya, but under NATO’s command.

Today France named an official envoy to Libya’s opposition government, according to Agence France-Presse.

Little has been said about France’s quieter partner, Britain. Like France, it will likely continue operating under the auspices of NATO. Prime Minister David Cameron convened today's meeting in London to discuss the coalition’s role moving forward and seems to support coalition involvement in crafting a political solution in Libya.

2 of 4
You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us