Likely Egypt election runoff: Muslim Brother vs. Mubarak man

According to initial returns from Egypt's presidential election, Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood and Ahmed Shafiq, Mubarak's prime minister, are likely to face off in next month's runoff.

|
Fredrik Persson/AP
An Egyptian woman shows her inked finger after voting during the second day of presidential elections inside a polling station in the Mataraya neighborhood of Cairo, Egypt, May 24. Egyptians voted Thursday on the second day of a landmark presidential election that will produce a successor to longtime authoritarian ruler Hosni Mubarak.

Initial returns from Egypt’s first post-revolution presidential election indicate that the race is headed to the most polarizing showdown possible: a runoff between the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi, and the candidate most closely associated with former President Hosni Mubarak’s regime, Ahmed Shafiq. 

Official results will not be announced until next week. But according to Dr. Morsi’s campaign, which has observers at each vote-counting station and says 90 percent of the vote has been counted, he and Mr. Shafiq are leading and will advance to a runoff. If the Brotherhood is correct, the race between the two figures will sharpen the bitter divide between Islamists and remnants of the Mubarak regime and could plunge Egypt into further instability.

It also leaves many Egyptians, those who support the revolution but don’t want a strongly Islamist president, feeling disenfranchised. Some counts suggest Hamdeen Sabbahi, a proponent of Gamal Abdel Nasser's pan-Arab ideology who ran on a populist platform, was fairly close, coming in third place with some votes yet to be counted.

The runoff, schedule for June 16 and 17, will put tremendous pressure on Egypt’s transition, just two weeks before the interim military rulers have promised to hand over power.

Surprising rise of Shafiq, Mubarak's prime minister

Though Morsi was not depicted as a front-runner in polls leading up to the race, he is backed by the most organized political machine in the post-revolution uprising. His strong emphasis on religious rhetoric and promises to implement sharia, or Islamic law, energized his base while frightening many secularist Egyptians.

Shafiq’s rise, however, is surprising to some. His impressive showing – less than a year and a half after Egyptians revolted against the regime he was a part of – means that Egypt could see a president who condemned the very uprising that made his campaign possible.

After the uprising against Mubarak’s regime began in January, the embattled president appointed Shafiq as prime minister in a cabinet shakeup intended to appease the protesters. Shafiq remained in this post when regime-backed thugs attacked the protesters gathered in Tahrir Square. He is seen as the preferred candidate of the military, which has appeared reluctant to give up its power and privileges when it transfers power to a civilian government.

Khalil al-Anani, an expert on Islamist movements at Durham University in Britain, says Shafiq's rise is due to the organization of the remnants of Mubarak’s regime, a backlash against the Brotherhood, and a transition period mismanaged by Egypt’s military, which left many Egyptians craving stability and security. It was also aided by the fragmentation of the secularist-liberal vote, which was split between several candidates.

Many Christians appeared to vote for Shafiq as an anti-Islamist vote. Some said that their priests in the Coptic Orthodox church had urged them to vote for the former Air Force commander and Mubarak-era minister. The Brotherhood has also suffered a backlash after winning nearly 50 percent of parliamentary seats several months ago. Some Egyptians say the party has failed to live up to its promises, and others are angry the organization went back on its year-long promise not to field a presidential candidate and seek to dominate Egypt’s political system.

Bicycle repairman Badr Ishaq in the mostly poor neighborhood of Imbaba voted for the Brotherhood in parliamentary elections, but said they had done nothing since. He voted for Shafiq this time around, hoping for better results.

Still others are tired of the unrest and violence that has wracked Egypt since the uprising, as the military rulers have blundered their way through the transition. They see Shafiq, a strong military man, as the one who can return stability and end chaos. Adel Shehata, a teacher who voted for Shafiq, said it was a matter of security.

“The most important thing is that he has a military background, which makes him capable to manage the country during this period,” he said after he voted Thursday. “Security is the No. 1 concern.”

All part of the military's plan?

Dr. Anani of Durham University says Shafiq’s strong showing is the result of a strategy by the country's interim military rulers. “Now I understand why the military insisted to postpone the elections, to get people tired, to create some kind of fatigue among people, at the expense of the revolution," he says. "They don't have to commit any kind of forgery now – there's no need. They already played on the minds of people.”

While Shafiq has campaigned as the candidate who can restore stability, his win in the runoff could do the opposite. Brotherhood leaders have stated that Shafiq could not win unless the state engaged in massive fraud, a scenario Brotherhood member Mohamed El Beltagi said recently would take place “over our dead bodies.” A Morsi loss could bring their supporters to the street. Anani also warns that a Shafiq win could bolster radical and violent Islamists. 

A win by Morsi, on the other hand, would face strong resistance from Egypt’s security apparatus, which for decades repressed, jailed, and tortured members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists.

According to incomplete counts, a late surge by Hamdeen Sabbahi, a pan-Arabist and leftist, put him in third place ahead of Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, a former Brotherhood member and moderate Islamist who sought to bridge the Islamist-secular polarization. Amr Moussa, Mubarak’s former foreign minister who enjoyed wide popularity and was considered a frontrunner in the race, was trailing, according to the initial counts. 

Many of the secular and liberal activists who helped spark Egypt's uprising will likely refuse to vote in the runoff, unwilling to back either a strong Islamist or a member of the Mubarak regime. Esraa Abdel Fattah, who helped plan a national strike in 2008 that was considered an important point on the road to the revolution, said she would boycott a Shafiq-Morsi race. "I cannot think that any of us [revolutionaries] can vote" in such a race, she said before the election. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Likely Egypt election runoff: Muslim Brother vs. Mubarak man
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2012/0525/Likely-Egypt-election-runoff-Muslim-Brother-vs.-Mubarak-man
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe