Finally a new Constitution for Tunisia, birthplace of Arab Spring

Tunisia overcame deep political divisions to draft a constitution that has majority support, while other countries in the region have slid into violence and political infighting.

|
Aimen Zine/AP
Members of the Tunisian National Constituent Assembly celebrate the adoption of the new Constitution in Tunis, Tunisia, Jan. 26, 2014.

Three years after protests, blood, and tear gas ended with the flight of a dictator, Tunisians at last have a constitution on which to build a new order. 

The document signed today is yet another example set by the country whose revolution kicked off the 2011 Arab uprisings. It establishes a civil democratic state, and lays the foundation for an independent judiciary and the protection of basic individual freedoms. And its drafting has forced Tunisia’s quarrelsome political parties to start learning the art of compromise after months of arguments and uncertainty.

Still, the Constitution is only a blueprint. Old laws must be reformed and new elections held, while leaders must confront Islamic militancy and cure economic malaise.

But a sense of pride, solidarity, and relief filled the Constituent Assembly chamber today as legislators and media packed into seats and aisles beneath a chandelier blazing with light. Portraits and Tunisian flags were placed on two seats in memory of Assemblymen Mohamed Brahmi, shot dead last July, and Mohamed Allouche, who died last week of a heart attack.

“We have known fear for our country and for its institutions,” said President Moncef Marzouki as he addressed the chamber. “Today we have the right to be joyful.”

A few minutes later, Mr. Marzouki held aloft the new Constitution, kissed it, then signed it. “Merci, president!” a voice cried from the press gallery as Marzouki made V-for-victory signs. Assembly Speaker Mustapha Ben Jaafar and Prime Minister Ali Larayedh also signed, and suddenly everyone was singing Tunisia’s national anthem as the three men clutched copies of the Constitution, bound in covers that were red, like the Tunisian flag.

Stop and go

Tunisia's last Constitution was adopted in 1959, three years after gaining independence from France. While in theory a republic, Tunisia swiftly descended into dictatorship as Presidents Habib Bourguiba and, later, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali used a fearsome police apparatus, pliable courts, and batteries of laws to stay in power.

Mr. Ben Ali’s ouster ended a dictatorship but triggered a culture war that has slowed political progress. Secularists have accused the ruling Islamist Ennahda party of harboring a radical agenda and failing to discipline the hard-line Salafi movement; Salafis are suspected in the murders to two opposition politicians last year, including Mr. Brahmi. Ennahda has complained of what it deems secularist obstructionism.

Last summer Tunisia’s transition – including the drafting of the new constitution – slammed to a halt as opposition parties mounted a campaign of street demonstrations and political maneuvering to oust Ennahda, which responded with demonstrations of its own.

Last month, however, after weeks of tortuous negotiations, parties agreed that the government would hand power to a caretaker cabinet. Tunisia’s Constituent Assembly whirred back to life and, with unprecedented energy, finished drafting the new constitution. It passed with 200 "yes" votes, 12 "no" votes, and four abstentions Sunday. Legislators greeted the result with a boisterous standing ovation.

Contradictions

The document reads like an exercise in finding consensus. It firmly cites Islam as Tunisia’s religion, but also describes the state as civil – not religious – in equally firm language and guarantees freedom of worship. Men and women are guaranteed equal rights. Some of the cruelest habits of Ben Ali’s regime – torture, spying on people’s homes and private communications, and forcing citizens into exile – are expressly forbidden. 

Yet there are also apparent contradictions. Among the most contentious is an 11th-hour amendment to an article on religious rights that obliges the state to protect “the sacred” from insult and quash any attempts to brand people as apostates. Fulfilling either of those duties could amount to limiting free speech – guaranteed in another article.

Judges face a similar conundrum with existing laws that clash with the new Constitution, says Kalthoum Kennou, a judge in Tunis and honorary president of the Tunisian Magistrates’ Association. In theory, those wrinkles will be ironed out by a planned constitutional court.

“My fear is that in this initial period, unconstitutional laws may be passed since we won’t have an independent body to check them,” Ms. Kennou says.

Meanwhile, economic troubles loom. Growth is expected to have slipped from 3.6 percent in 2012 to 2.6 percent last year, and to drop again this year, according to the World Bank. Unemployment is hovering around 15 percent and is worse among young people and in rural areas, where revolt against Ben Ali began in late 2010. Several dozen people gathered today outside the assembly hall to voice their frustration at the leaders within. 

“The price of food is high, and they’ve taken many loans from abroad,” said Osama Mrassi, who said he sells used plastic bottles to make ends meet. From his neck hung a sign that said, “The Constitution Doesn’t Represent Me” in Arabic.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Finally a new Constitution for Tunisia, birthplace of Arab Spring
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2014/0127/Finally-a-new-Constitution-for-Tunisia-birthplace-of-Arab-Spring
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe