Israel says West, Iran likely to agree on 'bad deal' for Iranian nuclear program

The Israeli strategic affairs minister says two fundamental issues that need to be toughened up were the number of centrifuges and how to prevent Iran getting any capacity to pursue research and development.

|
Remy de la Mauviniere/AP
Israeli Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz gestures as he speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Paris, Monday, March 23, 2015. Steinitz said Monday that dialogue with France over Iran's nuclear program "has proven in the past that it was productive" and makes this week's last-minute diplomatic mission to Paris worthwhile.

Israel said on Monday it was probable that world powers and Iran would agree to a "bad deal" on Tehran's nuclear program and it would do all it could to toughen any accord before talks resume this week.

"We think it's going to be a bad, insufficient deal," Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz told Reuters in an interview before meeting French officials in Paris. "It seems quite probable it will happen, unfortunately."

France, the United States and four other powers suspended talks with Iran in Switzerland on Friday and will reconvene this week to try to break the deadlock over Tehran's atomic research program and the lifting of sanctions before a March 31 deadline for a framework deal.

Israel, which is believed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, is not a party to the negotiations but feels especially threatened by the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran. It has in the past threatened a military attack on Iran if it is not happy with an eventual deal.

It has long described France as the negotiating power with views closest to its own.

"Although we are against a deal in general, until it is completed we will point to specific loopholes and difficulties," Steinhitz said before meeting France's top nuclear negotiator and President Francois Hollande's diplomatic adviser.

Two fundamental issues that need to be toughened up were the number of centrifuges - machines that spin at supersonic speed to increase the concentration of the fissile isotope - and how to prevent Iran getting any capacity to pursue research and development, he said.

"In this (accord) you are getting a robust and complicated deal that enables Iran to preserve capabilities and allow it to remain a threshold nuclear state," he said.

The negotiations' goal is an arrangement whereby Iran would need at least one year to produce enough fissile material for a single atomic weapon, should Tehran choose to produce one. That is known as the "break-out" time.

Steinitz said Israel believed the current deal, which would allow roughly 6,000 centrifuges, would enable Iran to "dash to the bomb" within nine to ten months because its nuclear infrastructure would not be dismantled.

Iran says that its nuclear program is for peaceful needs only.

U.S. WILL NOT ABANDON ISRAEL

Steinitz will be looking to capitalize on differences among the powers after tensions surfaced between France and the United States over negotiation strategy.

At one point during the latest negotiations, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius phoned his team to ensure it made no more concessions, particularly on the lifting of any UN sanctions.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this month that the United States was negotiating a bad deal that could lead to a "nuclear nightmare" - drawing a rebuke from US President Barack Obama and deepening US-Israeli rift.

"I don't believe the US will abandon one of its closest allies, its closest and most democratic ally in the entire Middle East, because we express our differences on the Iran deal," said Steinitz, who is Netanyahu's point man on Iran.

"We cannot keep quiet when our national security is at stake."

When asked whether the United States was still sharing intelligence with Israel over the nuclear talks, Steinitz said: "We know everything we need to know. We don't feel any shortage. We are very well aware of what's going on," he said.

The target date for a full agreement is June 30.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Israel says West, Iran likely to agree on 'bad deal' for Iranian nuclear program
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2015/0323/Israel-says-West-Iran-likely-to-agree-on-bad-deal-for-Iranian-nuclear-program
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe