Israelis and Palestinians: 12 voices on the future

The Mideast conflict is not doomed to stalemate. A wide spectrum of Israelis and Palestinians are implementing their vision for the future without waiting for their leaders – or a peace deal.

11. ‘You need to build a state’ – senior Palestinian foreign policy adviser

Ann Hermes/Staff
Husam Zomlot says even as Palestinians broaden their push to end the Israeli occupation, they can do more for themselves.

One of the most celebrated images of the Palestinian struggle features 15-year-old Faris Odeh poised to throw a stone at an oncoming Israeli tank. It was October 2000, and the second intifada had just broken out. He was killed a few weeks later.

Now, that model is changing, says Husam Zomlot, a senior Palestinian diplomat and foreign policy adviser in Ramallah.

“For all these years we have been hitting our head against the tank,” says Mr. Zomlot. “We’re changing this…. You don’t use the power of arms, you use the power of logic, you use the power of law, you use the power of solidarity. It’s a shift of mind-set.”

There’s also a parallel shift, he says, from focusing solely on negotiations with Israel to simultaneously engaging international levers of pressure, such as legal action at the International Criminal Court, and recognition of Palestine by United Nations members.

“The biggest mistake we have made, and we are realizing this and we are correcting [it] … is that for 20 years we have managed to help Israel delay its moment of choice” between assuming full responsibility for about 4.5 million Palestinians, or relinquishing control over them, he says. “You cannot continue to have full control and no responsibility…. You must decide.”

“My generation will hit them with that moment of choice,” says Zomlot, an economist by training who is part of Fatah’s younger cadres.

Zomlot, who previously worked for the United Nations and spent two years as a fellow at Harvard University, is tall, charming, and talks so fast that I activate my audio recorder the second I walk in his office.

He does not drone on with monologues that could have been delivered in the 1980s. He does not seem burdened with the resignation that seems to snuff the energy and initiative out of other Palestinian officials. He jumps up and down from his desk as he talks, and makes his visitors laugh. But he is very serious when he says that in 10 or 20 years he thinks things will be much better.

“The overall situation is moving from the obsession in both camps about the big picture, about … a one-off event that will finish the other side,” he says. “I think both sides have realized by and large that this is not going to happen.”

So it’s not about waiting until the Israeli occupation ends, and then building a state. Even now, Palestinians can and should do more to improve societal conditions, such as education, says Zumlot.

“This is not giving up politics, rights, legitimate aspirations. This is a social hope,” he says. “It’s vital that you claim a state, but you also need to build a state.”

“My source of hope is that this equation that you either fight or negotiate is not going to be the only equation,” he says. “No, you fight, you negotiate, you communicate, you seek international action, you build on the ground, you bring creative ways of sustaining yourself … this is my source of hope.”

11 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.