Weibrecht, Bode Miller grateful for super-G medals, for different reasons

Andrew Weibrecht and Bode Miller won silver and bronze in the super-G at the Sochi Olympics to help put disappointments for themselves and the USA alpine team behind them.

|
Mike Segar/Reuters
Winner Kjetil Jansrud of Norway (2nd l.), second-placed Andrew Weibrecht of the USA (l.), and joint third-placed Bode Miller of the USA (r.) and Canada's Jan Hudec pose on podium during a flower ceremony after the men's alpine skiing super-G competition during the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics at the Rosa Khutor Alpine Center Sunday.

As American Andrew Weibrecht crossed the finish line in the men's super-G Sunday, he took a calm moment to be grateful for what he had just done. 

He had not yet looked at the scoreboard or at his celebrating coaches, nor had he yet registered the increased volume of the crowd. He didn't know if he had finished fifth or 25th. But he knew one thing: For the first time in years, he had skied his best when it mattered most.

Because of his race, Weibrecht will take home a silver medal from this Olympics, with Norwegian Kjetil Jansrud taking gold and American Bode Miller and Canadian Jan Hudac tying for bronze. It was Jansrud's third medal of this Olympics (gold in the downhill and bronze in the combined), while Miller, at 36, became the oldest alpine medalist in Olympic history. All that we can understand.

But at a press conference hours later, Weibrecht was still struggling to explain that moment at the finish line, where he didn't know he had won anything, yet, in his heart, knew what he had won regardless of what the scoreboard said. Because more than medals or money, it is that feeling that made him fight through four surgeries and three lost years on the World Cup circuit to continue to throw himself down mountains at speeds that scare even him.

If Weibrecht hadn't won silver, perhaps this would seem a clichéd coping mechanism: "I didn't ski well, but I was happy with my run." The tendency is to roll our eyes and flip to the hockey, where American might actually win a medal.

But on a day like Sunday, when Weibrecht speaks and the medal sounds almost like a bonus, the attitude of an Olympian comes into clearer focus. The margins of victory at the Olympics can be so small, and so many things can be out of your control – from conditions to pairings to equipment failures – the only true gauge of "success" is often what is within the athlete's own head.

And perhaps nowhere is that more true than alpine skiing.

Imagine if Augusta National cut its greens differently for every pairing or baseball only allowed each player one at bat.

That's alpine skiing.

Weather can change the course midway through a race. Some conditions favor some skiers. Some courses favor some skiers. And, at least in the speed events, you only get one trip down the hill, so make one big mistake, and you're off the podium. There are no bottom-of-the-ninth rallies. 

So when Weibrecht arrives at the bottom of the hill, in some ways, he knows more than the clock. On Sunday, however, both were in agreement, and Weibrecht was left searching for words.

"This is probably one of the most incredible moments of my life. It has been such a difficult four years with all the surgeries, [so] to come back and to be able to throw it down at the perfect time, it's just.... I don't even have words for it."

Even at his best, Weibrecht probably skis "two good races" out of more than a dozen in a good season, he said. And since he won bronze in this same event in Vancouver, he has not had anything approaching a good season. Those four years have included four surgeries (two on his shoulders, two on his ankles) and doubts too numerous to count. He thought about quitting. Every time he came back, he never found that moment he found Sunday.

"I came back from three injuries and there was no affirmation" like his performance in Sunday's race. The doubts grew that he could ever again find a run like today's. "It got tougher and tougher."

He was beaten up. And he was, at least on some level, scared.

"I didn't think I could get injured until I did get injured," he said. "It took really letting it go and saying, 'I can get through this and be healthy at the end of the day.' "

For the best racers, that feeling of knowing you skied a good race comes more often. But not as often as failure. The best skier in the world, Norwegian Aksel Lund Svindal, has won five of 16 races this season on the World Cup, making the podium in another three. At the Olympics, he has yet to win a medal.

"The best guy in the world wins [only] a couple races," said Weibrecht. "You've got to learn how to manage disappointment."

Miller has had his share of that this Olympics. He came in skiing as well as he has in years, and he seemed to announce his intent by blowing the doors off the downhill course in training runs. But on race day, he came in eighth in the downhill and sixth in the combined. The slushy conditions that developed here last week don't play to his strengths, but he refused to back off his aggressive style. 

"In conditions like this, I'd probably get the best results if I skied 80 percent," he said. "But I feel terrible when I ski that way, so I end up making a lot of mistakes and that can cost a lot of time and races."

He made mistakes Sunday. Unlike Weibrecht, he came to the finish feeling like he'd just wrestled with a buffalo and didn't think his time would stand up. It did, for bronze, but barely. 

"Today it was really a struggle, and that's a different kind of achievement," he said.

That gives him six career Olympic alpine medals, second to Norwegian Kjetil Andre Aamodt's eight, and the somewhat faint hope for another in the giant slalom Wednesday.

"I come into the giant slalom with something to prove," he said.

Meanwhile, Jansrud describes himself as "floating and feeling great." Never mind that he's never before outshone countryman Svindal like this. The Olympics are here to remind us that alpine skiing is a fickle thing. And so long as that feeling is out there on top of the mountain for him, Jansrud's going to come down fast – and know it.

"So far this Olympics has gone better than I hoped."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Weibrecht, Bode Miller grateful for super-G medals, for different reasons
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Olympics/2014/0216/Weibrecht-Bode-Miller-grateful-for-super-G-medals-for-different-reasons
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe