Modern field guide to security and privacy

What Teddy Roosevelt can teach us about cybersecurity

Why wait years to grow new cybersecurity talent when you can take advantage of the talented federal workforce today?

|
AP/File
With characteristic fervor, Theodore Roosevelt, is shown speaking during the Presidential Campaign of 1900.

The US government needs a lot more cyber professionals — and needs them fast. 

In a recent White House blog, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced the new Federal Cyber Workforce Strategy in which it identified the target goal of 3,500 new hires by January 2017.

Even if the government moved with uncommon speed, moving so quickly to staff positions in a field with close to zero unemployment is an ambitious goal, to say the least.

But that’s no reason for despair.

I would suggest that the cyber workforce shortage could be managed if the government applied the perspective of a prior occupant of the White House: “Do what you can, with what you have, where you are,” said Theodore Roosevelt in 1913.

The 26th president’s theory does seem to collide with our current reality: not enough trained cybersecurity workers and the assumption that non-cybersecurity workers can’t easily attain enough technical skill to be useful.

With so few skilled cyber professionals in the pipeline, though, I don’t think the government has a choice but to rethink assumptions. It must place an immediate focus on its existing resources instead of trying to speed up a talent pipeline that will take years to establish.

What many do not know is that advancement opportunities for government personnel with little to no security experience do exist. 

For instance, (ISC)2 ’s SSCP certification requires only one year of experience and is ideal for non-security IT personnel who focus on day-to-day operations. Another example is the Associate of (ISC)2 that bridges that gap between needing certification and needing experience. If someone does not have that experience but can pass one of our exams, they can become an Associate.

Both the Associate and SSCP programs provide employers (or potential employers) confidence that an individual’s cybersecurity skills are up to date and that they are knowledgeable of internationally recognized standards.

While such training won’t stand in for hard-won experience defending networks, an organization that encourages its personnel to pursue these designations works to help bolster security throughout the organization, ultimately changing the organization’s culture into one that accepts cybersecurity as a business reality rather than just a technology challenge.

In other words, pursuing such measures reflects President Roosevelt’s wisdom of using the tools and talents we have at hand. 

The next step? Organizations which help grow their employees’ talents must dedicate ongoing resources to the retention of its existing cybersecurity professionals. 

Given the multiple factors working against the government’s efforts to build a skilled workforce, existing cyber professionals must be nurtured and rewarded with training and continuing education opportunities to help contend with the lures of the private sector.

Clearly, not every non-security professional wants to become a security professional. But if we’re going to break the bottleneck of cybersecurity talent, we must do what we can, with what we have, where we are. And that means breaking old assumptions and cultivating talent in the workforce that’s right here, right now.

Dan Waddell, CISSP, is the Director of US Government Affairs and the Managing Director for the North America Region of (ISC)2 . You can follow him on Twitter @DanWaddellCISSP.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What Teddy Roosevelt can teach us about cybersecurity
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/Security-culture/2016/0823/What-Teddy-Roosevelt-can-teach-us-about-cybersecurity
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe