A piece of news that should have Vladimir Putin grinning

Britain appears to want to protect London's lucrative financial industry from the repercussions of any sanctions targeting Russian or Ukrainian officials.

|
Alexei Nikolsky/Presidential Press Service/RIA Novosti/AP
President Vladimir Putin answers journalists' questions on the current situation in Ukraine at the Novo-Ogaryovo presidential residence outside Moscow on Tuesday, March 4, 2014.

A Russian annexation of Crimea is apparently underway, with thousands of Russian troops already in de facto possession. NATO does not have treaty obligations to defend Ukrainian territory and the Russian military has a very healthy military arsenal. Generally countries with nukes try not to go to war with other countries with nukes. 

So that leaves the question of what the US and its European partners could do to penalize Russia for its actions.

One step could be to go after the assets of Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs close to the Kremlin, and the ill-gotten wealth of many of the members of President Vladimir Putin's inner circle. But if Britain has anything to say about it, any step in that direction would likely be highly discretionary. 

The Guardian reported Monday that a photographer had snapped a photo of a document in the hands of an official entering the prime minister's offices. British officials are apparently so careless with government documents that freelance shooter Steve Back has made a career of this.

While the document isn't government policy – for all we know it could be a proposal that was shot down – it underlines just how far Britain, and probably many other EU states, would be willing to go to back up their high-minded rhetoric about "international norms." The short answer? Absent a major military escalation from Russia, not very.

Among the points in the photographed document was a recommendation that Britain should oppose trade sanctions against Russia, at least for the moment, and that "London's financial centre" should remain open to Russians.

There's a good reason for that. Tax revenue from financial services is worth about $105 billion a year - about 12 percent of UK tax revenue. Over the past decade, Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs, amongst other rich foreigners, have flooded London's banks and real estate market. Many of these rich and politically-connected businessmen made their fortunes from the natural resources grab that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. One sign of that tide of cash was the $360 million purchase of Chelsea Football Club by Roman Abrahamovich, a Russian entrepreneur. 

Safe destination

Targeting Russian assets in Britain could be costly – and disruptive. It would not only do damage to current investments but also send a message to other foreign billionaires that London isn't such a safe destination for their cash. And the current mantra seems to be "what's good for the City of London is what's good for Britain."

And it's not the only area where national economic concerns are likely to trump worries about Russia's invasion of Crimea.

Russia is the biggest gas supplier to Europe – about 25 percent of total consumption – and earns roughly $100 million a day (about $36 billion a year). While a loss of that revenue would hurt Russia, a loss of supply would hurt European nations. Energy has long been a powerful card in Vladimir Putin's back pocket should he chose to wield it. And winter isn't over yet in Europe. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A piece of news that should have Vladimir Putin grinning
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2014/0304/A-piece-of-news-that-should-have-Vladimir-Putin-grinning
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe