Football 2016: a sideline full of 10 new books

Those who like to huddle over a good football read have quite a roster to choose from this fall.

5. ‘Lost Champions: Four Men, Two Teams, and the Breaking of Football’s Color Line,’ by Gretchen Atwood

A former sportswriter with a deep interest in sports, social justice, and American history, Gretchen Atwood was thumbing through an NFL history one day when she was suddenly stopped in her mental tracks. What caught her attention was that four players had entered professional football in 1946, a year before attention focused on Jackie Robinson’s integration of Major League Baseball. Why, she wondered, do we know so relatively little about Kenny Washington and Woody Strode of the NFL’s Los Angeles Rams and Bill Willis and Marion Motley of the Cleveland Browns, who then played in the rival All-America Football Conference? Part of the answer lies in the overwhelming popularity of baseball at the time, but Atwood digs even deeper for an explanation. In doing so, she chronicles the careers of these four stars, who met on the field in the 1950 NFL championship game, the first played after the NFL expanded to include the Browns. The opponents boasted the most prolific offenses in pro football up to the point. 

Here’s an excerpt from Lost Champions:

“The [Cleveland] Browns would open the inaugural AAFC season at home against the Miami Seahawks, the only franchise in all of pro sports in 1946 located in the Deep South. Miami’s owner and head coach stocked the team exclusively with white Southern players, or white men who had starred at Southern universities. Like George Preston Marshall’s Washington team in the NFL, the Miami Seahawks were built and marketed as the team of the South, in hopes of nurturing a broad regional fan base.

“Black fans and press circled December 7, the day the Browns would play the Seahawks, but this time in Miami. Florida state law banned interracial sports competition, which meant that black and white athletes were not allowed together on the same field. What would happen when the Browns showed up with [Bill] Willis and [Marion] Motley? No one really knew.”

5 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.